Page 95 - Adsorption Technology & Design, Elsevier (1998)
P. 95

92  Rates of  adsorption of gases and vapours by porous media


            a  moments  analysis  of  adsorbate  breakthrough  curves  from  a  column
            containing  a  zeolite  adsorbent  yields  an  expression  which  can  be  used  to
            determine  the  separate  mass  transfer  and  diffusion  resistances.  Denoting
            the  first  moment  of  the  response  to  an  input  signal  by/~  and  the  second
            moment by 0 "2, the ratio o'2/2/12 yields results for a general model formulated
            by Haynes and Sarma (1973) which may be compared with the same ratio of
            moments obtained for the simplified model employing a linear driving force
            for the adsorption  rate. When experiments are confined to a low Reynolds
            number region of flow (u being the superficial fluid velocity through the bed
            of voidage e) the result for the general model is
                                         Rp2                  e  )-2
               o'2L = DL(e+  1[ Rp2 + ~ + ~ rc2  )(lq
              2p 2 u   u 2   i  e]kaDm  15epDp  15KD~      K(I-  e)     (4.45)
                              -
            where K is the Henry's law constant.
              For  the  linear  rate  model  of  Glueckauf  and  Coates  the  corresponding
            result is
                            (e)l(
              2~ z u  -  u z  +  i-e)  ~   1 +(1-e)------K             (4.46)

            where  ka  is  the  rate  coefficient  corresponding  to  the  linear  driving  force
            model (equation 4.45).
              Both models become equivalent if
                1     Rp 2    Rp 2     re 2
                   =  ~   +        +                                    (4.47)
               kaK   3Dm    15epDp    15KDc
            The individual axial dispersion term DL, the molecular diffusion coefficient
            Dm  and  the  intraparticle  and  intracrystalline  diffusivities  may  thus  be
            extracted from equation (4.45) from a plot of (cr2/2ju 2) (L/u) against 1/u 2 for a
            range of particle sizes. Figure 4.12 shows such an experimental plot for three
            different adsorbates, N2, CF4 and i-C4H10 passed at low velocity through a
            bed  of 4A  zeolite  (Kumar  et  al.  1982).  The  slope  of  the  lines  yields  the
            numerical value of the dispersion coefficient DL while the intercepts provide
            the  determination  of  kaK.  Repeating  the  experiments  with  different  size
            particles  enables  the  evaluation  of the  molecular  diffusion  coefficient  Dm
            and the intraparticle diffusivity Dp. To estimate Ddr~ 2 an adsorbate such as
            CF4 or i-C4H10- molecules too large to penetrate into the crystalline zeolite
            cavities-  is employed. The  lines for N2 are  temperature  sensitive  and  this
            reflects  dominant  intracrystalline  diffusion  resistance.  Subtraction  of  the
            intercepts  (determined  at  the  same  temperature)  for  N2  and  CF4  then
            provides  an  estimate  of  the  intracrystalline  diffusivity.  Crystallites  of
            different sizes would yield similar information.
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100