Page 43 - Advanced Linear Algebra
P. 43

Preliminaries  27



            Definition We will refer to the equivalence classes under the relation of being
            associate as the associate classes  of  .…
                                         9
            Theorem 0.28 Let   be a ring.
                           9
             )
            1   An element "9  is a unit if and only if º"»~9 .
             )
            2    —   if and only if º » ~º » .
            3      )   divides   if and only if     º  »  ‹  º     . »

                                                    %
            4      )   properly divides   , that is,       ~  %      where   is not a unit, if and only if
               º » ‰ º ».…
            In the case of the integers, an integer is prime if and only if it is irreducible. In
            any integral domain, prime elements are irreducible, but the converse need not
            hold.  In the ring  {  j  c     µ  ~  ¸     b     j  c     “     Á       {´  ¹   the irreducible element
                (
            divides the product  ²  b  j  c ³²  c  j  c ³ ~    but does not  divide  either
            factor.)

            However, in principal ideal domains, the two concepts are equivalent.

            Theorem 0.29 Let   be a principal ideal domain.
                           9
             )
            1   An   9  is irreducible if and only if the ideal º »  is maximal.
            2   An element in   is prime if and only if it is irreducible.
             )
                           9
             )
            3   The  elements   Á    9   are  relatively prime , that is, have no common
               nonunit factors, if and only if there exist  Á    9  for which
                                            b    ~
               This is denoted by writing ² Á  ³ ~   .
                           )
            Proof. To prove 1 , suppose that   is irreducible and that º » ‹º » ‹9 . Then

              º » and so    ~%  for some  %  9. The irreducibility of    implies that    or
            % is a unit. If    is a unit, then  º »~9 and if  % is a unit, then  º »~º% »~º ».
                                        (

            This  shows  that  º »   is  maximal.  We have  º » £ 9 , since   is not a unit.)

            Conversely, suppose that   is not irreducible, that is,  ~            where neither   nor

              is a unit. Then  º » ‹º » ‹9. But if  º »~º », then    — , which implies that

                            º is a unit. Hence      »  £  º     »  º     »  ~  9 . Also, if   , then   must be a unit. So we
            conclude that º »  is not maximal, as desired.
                     )

            To prove 2 , assume first that   is prime and    ~        . Then    “      or    “     . We

            may assume that  “   . Therefore,   ~ % ~ %   . Canceling  's gives   ~ %
            and so   is a unit. Hence,   is irreducible.  Note that this argument applies in
                                                (


            any integral domain.)

            Conversely, suppose that   is irreducible and let  “           . We wish to prove that
              “   or    “  . The ideal  º » is maximal and so  º Á  » ~ º » or  º Á  » ~ 9. In the
            former case,  “    and we are done. In the latter case, we have
                                        ~%  b &
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48