Page 59 - Advanced Linear Algebra
P. 59

Vector Spaces   43



            same subspace (say  ) or from different subspaces—one from   and one from
                             :
                                                                :
            ;                        #. When we say that a vector   cannot be written as a sum of vectors from the
                                 ;
                           :
            distinct subspaces   and  , we mean that   cannot be written as a sum  b  %  &
                                                #
            where   and   can be interpreted  as coming from different subspaces, even if
                  %
                       &
            they  can  also  be  interpreted  as coming from the same subspace. Thus, if
            %Á &  : q ; , then  # ~ % b & does  express  # as a sum of vectors from distinct
            subspaces.
            Theorem 1.5 Let < ~¸: “  0¹  be a family of distinct subspaces of  . The
                                                                       =

            following are equivalent:
            1  )(Independence of the family )  For each  0 ,
                                         p      s
                                     : q      :    ~ ¸ ¹

                                         q   £   t

            2  )(Uniqueness of expression for   )  The zero vector   cannot be written as a
                sum of nonzero vectors from distinct subspaces of  .
                                                        <
            3  )(Uniqueness of expression )  Every nonzero #=   has a unique, except for
                order of terms, expression as a sum
                                       # ~   bÄb
                of nonzero vectors from distinct subspaces in  .
                                                    <
            Hence, a sum
                                        =~     :
                                              0
                                        )–
            is direct if and only if any one of 1 3  holds.
                                          )
            Proof. Suppose that 2) fails, that is,
                                      ~  b Ä b
            where the nonzero        's are from distinct subspaces       :     . Then  €         and so

                                    c  ~   bÄb


            which violates 1). Hence, 1) implies 2). If 2) holds and
                           # ~   b Äb           # ~ ! bÄb!     and
            where the terms are nonzero and the  's belong to distinct subspaces in   and
                                                                        <

            similarily for the  's, then
                          !


                                 ~   b Äb  c! cÄc!
            By collecting terms from the same subspaces, we may write
                  ~ ²  c! ³bÄb²  c ! ³b         b   bÄb  c!       b   cÄc!
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64