Page 189 - Aerodynamics for Engineering Students
P. 189

172  Aerodynamics for Engineering Students

                   u’ and  v’  represent  the departure  of  the local velocity from the undisturbed free
                   stream, and are commonly known as the disturbance or perturbation velocities. In
                   fact, thin-aerofoil theory is an example of a small perturbation theory.
                     The  velocity  component  perpendicular  to  the  aerofoil  profile  is  zero.  This
                   constitutes the  boundary  condition  for  the  potential  flow  and  can  be  expressed
                   mathematically as:
                                    -usinp+vcosp=O      at  y=yu  and  y1
                   Dividing both sides by cos p, this boundary condition can be rewritten as

                          -(Ucosa+ul)-+Usina+v’=O           at  y=yu  and  y1         (4.11)
                                        dY
                                        dx
                   By  making  the  thin-aerofoil  assumptions mentioned  above,  Eqn  (4.11) may  be
                   simplified. Mathematically, these assumptions can be written in the form

                                                      dYu        dyl
                                                                    <<
                                      yu and yl e c;  a,-   and  - 1
                                                      dx         dx
                   Note that the additional assumption is made that the slope of the aerofoil profile is
                   small. These thin-aerofoil assumptions imply that the disturbance velocities are small
                   compared to the undisturbed free-steam speed, i.e.

                                               ut  and   VI<< U
                     Given the above assumptions Eqn (4.1 1) can be simplified by replacing cos a and
                   sina by  1 and  a respectively.  Furthermore,  products  of  small quantities can be
                   neglected, thereby allowing the  term  u‘dyldx  to  be  discarded so  that  Eqn  (4.1 1)
                   becomes

                                                                                      (4.12)

                   One further simplification can be made by recognizing that if yu and y1 e c then to
                   a sufficiently good approximation the boundary conditions Eqn (4.12) can be applied
                   at y = 0 rather than at y = y,  or y1.
                     Since potential flow with Eqn (4.12) as a boundary condition is a linear system, the
                   flow around a cambered aerofoil at incidence can be regarded as the superposition of
                   two separate flows, one circulatory and the other non-circulatory. This is illustrated
                   in Fig. 4.1 1. The circulatory flow is that around an infinitely thin cambered plate and
                   the non-circulatory flow is that around a symmetric aerofoil at zero incidence. This
                   superposition can be demonstrated formally as follows. Let
                                       yu=yc+yt      and     H=yc-yt
                                               --
                   y = yc(x) is the function describing the camber line and y = yt = (yu - y1)/2 is known
                   as the thickness function. Now Eqn (4.12) can be rewritten in the form

                                                              dYt
                                                 dYc
                                           VI=  u--   Ua f u-  dx
                                                 dx
                                                 Circulatory  Non-circulatory
                   where the plus sign applies for the upper surface and the minus sign for the lower
                   surface.
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194