Page 199 - Aerodynamics for Engineering Students
P. 199

182  Aerodynamics for Engineering Students

                experimental data, especially near the leading edge and near stagnation points where
                the small perturbation theory, for example, breaks down. Any local inaccuracies tend
               to vanish in the overall integration processes, however, and the aerofoil coefficients
               are found to be reliable theoretical predictions.


               '' 4.s  The flapped aerofoil


               Thin aerofoil theory lends itself very readily to aerofoils with variable camber such as
               flapped  aerofoils.  The  distribution  of  circulation  along  the  camber  line  for  the
               general aerofoil has been found to consist of the sum of a component due to a flat
               plate at incidence and a component due to the camber-line shape. It is sufficient for
               the assumptions  in the theory  to consider the influence of  a flap  deflection as an
               addition to the two components above. Figure 4.14 shows how the three contribu-
               tions can be combined. In fact the deflection of the flap about a hinge in the camber
               line effectively alters the camber so that the contribution due to flap deflection is the
               effect of an additional camber-line shape.
                 The problem  is  thus reduced to the  general case of  finding a distribution to fit
               a camber  line made up  of  the  chord  of  the  aerofoil  and  the  flap chord  deflected
               through 7 (see Fig. 4.15). The thin aerofoil theory does not require that the leading
               and/or trailing edges be on the x axis, only that the surface slope is small and the
               displacement from the x axis is small.
                 With the camber defined as hc the slope of the part AB of the aerofoil is zero, and
               that of the flap - h/F. To find the coefficients of k for the flap camber, substitute
               these values  of  slope in  Eqns  (4.41) and  (4.42)  but  with  the  limits of  integration
               confined to the parts of the aerofoil over which the slopes occur. Thus

                                                                                  (4.48)


               where q5  is the value of 0 at the hinge, i.e.  C
                    ----t +-                       2
                                         (1 -F)c=-(1  -cos$)





                            (a 1  Due  to  carnberline shape
                         y





                                --  -_


                            ( c  Due  to  incidence change




               Fig. 4.14  Subdivision  of lift contributions to total  lift of cambered  flapped  aerofoil
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204