Page 58 - Aesthetic Formations Media, religion, and the Sense
P. 58

“Don’t Ask Questions, Just Observe!”        43

                          Eloquent Silence


       What we find, then, is that, on the one hand, the truth-unsettling work of
       the simulacrum produces a call for an assertion of the boundaries of the
       true and authentic community of Candomblé. On the other hand, how-
       ever, all attempts by the priesthood to produce such an assertion in the
       public sphere force them to “translate” their religious knowledge in pub-
       licly accessible terms, thus fuelling the simulacrum even further.
         The call “not to ask questions” is an attempt to deal with these issues:
       attacking discursivity to bypass the “labyrinths” (as Mãe Stella phrased it
       succinctly) of meaning production; just as Mãe Stella’s authoritative silence
       in the face of the anthropologist’s endless stream of words at the opening
       night of the Cultural Week was highly suggestive of the priestess having
       access to greater, deeper truths. And this was indeed the suggestion made
       by all the priests that I encountered: getting to know us is getting to know
       our “deep truths,” and these can only be accessed through initiation. A
       closer look at these “deep truths” may be necessary here.
         The fact that Candomblé is a religion based on initiation means that its
       performance of secrecy is crucial. This performance of secrecy is guided by
       a great many rules and regulations, which determine who has access to
       what knowledge, and at what time; who is allowed to speak and who is to
       remain silent; who has the right to tread certain areas of the terreiro; who
       is allowed to see sacred objects or witness ritual practices and who is not.
       Breaking these rules and regulations may cause the wrath of both priests
       and spirits (cf. Johnson 2002; and for Bahia, Castillo 2005).
         The performance of secrecy is inextricably linked with—or rather
       expressive of—a very particular understanding in Candomblé circles as to
       what constitutes religious knowledge and how religious knowledge can be
       transmitted. Candomblé holds that knowledge can only be obtained
       through the “lived experience of interpersonal and group relationships,
       through transmission and absorption of a  força (force), and a gradual
       development of symbolical and complex knowledge about all the collec-
       tive and individual elements of the system at all levels” (Elbein dos Santos

       1989, 17). What this means is that year in, year out, the cultists go through
       the motions of the ceremonies and ritual obligations, and it is only
       with the passing of the ritual cycles, with feeling the density of time itself,
       that the experiential knowledge that Candomblé seeks to instill in its
       adepts “sinks in.” Knowledge, in other words, comes with doing: with
       observing the taboos, participating in the rituals, subjecting oneself to the
       rigid terreiro hierarchy, respecting one’s commitments to the orixás.
       People from Candomblé are resolute in saying that there is no other road
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63