Page 302 - Air Pollution Control Engineering
P. 302

05_chap_wang.qxd  05/05/2004  3:51 pm  Page 281
                    Wet and Dry Scrubbing                                                     281

                          The design of Q-PAC using rounded surfaces and needles to support droplet forma-
                          tion was arrived at through extensive trial and error. A liquid stream is forced into a
                          shower of droplets by the media; in turn, the media’s mass transfer efficiency increases.
                          It is interesting to note that the new media, in addition to reduced capital costs (the
                          result of smaller tower diameter) and lower operating costs (a direct result of lower
                          operating costs due to reduced pressure drop) that have been previously discussed in
                          this handbook, offer additional savings to industry.
                          Regardless of the design of a given packing, the cost of that packing will be fixed
                          based on the amount of material (plastic resin, metal, ceramic, etc.) that is required to
                          produce the packing. It is important to note that the amount of plastic needed to pro-
                          duce a cubic foot of Q-PAC as well as the number of pieces of Q-PAC needed to fill
                          a cubic foot is far less than any other early contemporary packings. This is very sig-
                          nificant when it is realized that the cost of plastic resin represents approx 40% of the
                          final cost of a packing when using polyethylene to mold the packing. If a more
                          expensive plastic resin such as Teflon must be used (because of chemical- or tem-
                          perature-resistance considerations), the cost of resin can escalate to 95% of the final
                          cost of the packing.
                          Also, as plastic media are produced by injection molding, the number of pieces per
                          cubic foot will directly impact the final cost of a packing. The greater the number of
                          pieces needed for a cubic foot, the more costly to mold and, hence, the more expen-
                          sive a given packing will be.
                                                                                      3
                          It should be noted that in order to reduce the cost of injection molding ($/ft ) a greater
                          number of pieces need to be molded in a single cycle of the injection-molding
                          machine. However, to accomplish this, a multipiece mold is required for the injection-
                          molding process. The fabrication cost of this type of mold increases geometrically as
                          the number of pieces the mold is capable of producing is increased.  Therefore,
                          although the number of pieces being produced in a single cycle of the molder can be
                          increased, the savings thus realized in reduced labor costs are quickly consumed by
                          increased capital expenditure and amortization of the mold.

                          Modern mass transfer media should maximize mass transfer in scrubber towers (gas-
                          film-limited systems, per previous discussion).  The use of modern mass transfer
                          media provides several advantages:

                          • Smaller tower diameters: reduced capital and fabrication costs, smaller system
                             footprint!
                          • Lower pressure drop: smaller blower motor, lower electrical energy costs, less noise!
                          • Smaller chemical recirculation pumps: less costly!
                          • Smaller mist eliminators: less costly!
                          • Less total packing volume: reduced capital and fabrication costs, smaller system
                             footprint!
                                                                        3
                          • Greater mass transfer media: lower cost packing ($/ft )!
                          • Increase fouling and plugging resistant: reduced maintenance costs!
                          • Increase capacity of existing towers
                          Some commercial packings (such as LANPAC), on the other hand, maximize mass
                          transfer in liquid film-limited systems (per previous discussion), which is commonly
                          encountered in stripping situations. Other commercial packings (such as NUPAC) are
                          highly efficient media that have found a niche in keeping tower heights to the absolute
                          minimum, such as with are indoor tower.
   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307