Page 309 - Alternative Energy Systems in Building Design
P. 309

WIND TURBINE ENERGY ECONOMICS   283


                       security by making the electric transmission system more reliable and by reducing
                       shortages and the price volatility of natural gas. Transmission will be a key issue for the
                       wind industry’s future development over the next two decades.


                       WORLD WIND POWER PRODUCTION CAPACITY
                       As of the end of 2003, there were over 39,000 MW of generating capacity operating
                       worldwide, producing some 90 billion kWh each year—as much as 9 million average
                       American households use or as much as a dozen large nuclear power plants could
                       generate. However, this is but a tiny fraction of the potential of wind.


                       NEW TRANSMISSION LINES
                       According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the world’s winds theoretically
                       could supply the equivalent of 5800 quadrillion Btus (quads) of energy each year, more
                       than 15 times the current world energy demand. (A quad is equal to about 172 million
                       barrels of oil or 45 million tons of coal.) The potential of wind to improve the quality
                       of life in the world’s developing countries, where more than 2 billion people live with
                       no electricity or prospect of utility service in the foreseeable future, is vast.
                         “Wind Force 12,” a study performed by Denmark’s BTM Consult for the European
                       Wind Energy Association and Greenpeace, found that by the year 2020, wind could
                       provide 12 percent of the world’s electricity supplies, meeting the needs of 600 million
                       average European households.
                         Denmark is revisiting and currently rewriting its wind policy. The degree to which
                       this means that the United States should reexamine its own policy revolves around the
                       degree to which our situation is similar to Denmark’s. In fact, a brief analysis of some
                       major differences suggests that there are strong reasons for continuing to support wind
                       development in the United States rather than back away from it.
                         Wind supplies 20 percent of national electricity demand in Denmark. Although the
                       United States has nearly twice as much installed wind equipment as Denmark, wind
                       generates only 0.4 percent of our electricity, far below the 10 percent threshold iden-
                       tified by most analysts as the point at which wind’s variability becomes a significant issue
                       for utility system operators.
                         Denmark is also so small geographically (half the size of Indiana) that high winds
                       can cause many of its wind plants to shut down almost at once. In the United States,
                       wind plants are much more geographically dispersed (from California to New York to
                       Texas) and do not all experience the same wind conditions at the same time.
                         Rapid development of wind and new small-scale power plants within the past
                       5 years has brought Denmark to the point where power produced by so-called nondis-
                       patchable resources in the country’s west exceeds 100 percent of demand in the
                       region. At many times, this excess generation leaves the country scrambling to increase
                       electricity export capabilities to handle the surplus.  This situation is essentially
                       unimaginable in the United States.
                         Denmark’s approach encourages community involvement but places particular stress
                       on low-capacity distribution networks (at the “end of the line” on transmission systems).
   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314