Page 178 - An Introduction to Political Communication Fifth Edition
P. 178

Intro to Politics Communication (5th edn)-p.qxp  9/2/11  10:55  Page 157





                                                PRESSURE-GROUP POLITICS
                           the website operated by Australian Julian Assange, has frequently succeeded
                           in exposing material to the world which governments in the US and
                           elsewhere would much prefer had remained hidden. In one case, Wikileaks
                           put online a disturbing video depicting the killing of a group of Iraqis in
                           Baghdad by a US helicopter crew. For this leak, Assange was actively pursued
                           by the US and went underground. The material was available nonetheless,
                           presenting the US government of Barack Obama with an unwelcome agenda
                           of alleged war crimes, Pakistani state unreliability, and mounting military
                           losses. In this case, and in many others, new digital technologies with global
                           reach and widespread availability have altered the dynamics of pressure
                           group political communication.
                             In the remainder of this chapter we consider these issues in the context of
                           the experience of three different types of organisation: pressure groups
                           proper, such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth; illegal or ‘terrorist’
                           organisations, such as the Irish Republican Army (IRA) and al-Quaida; and,
                           to begin, the trade unions.


                                 POLITICAL COMMUNICATION AND INDUSTRIAL
                                                     RELATIONS

                           The trade unions in Britain and other countries have traditionally been
                           among the most ardent critics of media ‘bias’ against their viewpoints on,
                           and definitions of, issues in which they have an interest, such as the economy,
                           employment rights and industrial relations legislation. Fuelled by the work
                           of the Glasgow University Media Group (GUMG) in the 1970s, it was
                           argued by trade unionists that the media reported such issues from an
                           inherently anti-labour, pro-capital perspective. Media accounts of the causes
                           of industrial disputes, for example, tended to be dominated by management,
                           while the viewpoints of the workforce were simplified and distorted.
                             Perceiving this to be the case trade unions, like many other left-of-centre
                           organisations with political agendas to pursue, came to view the media as
                           ‘the enemy’ in an ongoing class struggle. To gain fair media coverage, it was
                           argued, the Left would have to build and sustain its own media channels, as
                           was attempted unsuccessfully with the Daily News experiment in Scotland
                           in the early 1970s (McKay and Barr, 1976), and the News on Sunday in 1986
                           (Chippindale and Horrie, 1988).
                             Since the late 1970s, however, trade unions have reassessed their rela-
                           tionship to the media, acknowledging that in addition to anti-labour biases
                           (of which there undoubtedly were and remain many, particularly amongst the
                           right-wing outlets) there are also spaces and opportunities for media coverage
                           which they can exploit.
                             Nicholas Jones’s still valuable study of the role played by the media in
                           industrial disputes asserts that the coming of Thatcherism fundamentally


                                                          157
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183