Page 54 - An Introduction to Political Communication Fifth Edition
P. 54

Intro to Politics Communication (5th edn)-p.qxp  9/2/11  10:55  Page 33





                                       THE EFFECTS OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION
                           as constructed by the photograph continued to exert an influence on voting
                           intentions.
                             The researchers acknowledged the methodological limitations of their
                           research, in so far as it was an artificial election with artificial candidates,
                           lacking ‘the social context and duration of a real campaign’ (ibid., p. 45), but
                           claim that they were able to repeat the experiment with similar results, thus
                           strengthening their validity.
                             Research conducted in Germany by Kepplinger and Dombach indicated
                           that certain camera angles, such as filming at eye level, produced a more
                           favourable audience response to a politician than others. They concluded
                           that ‘camera angles influence perception, particularly among a politician’s
                           supporters’ (1987, p. 71).
                             Some research has been concerned with the specific effects of different
                           media. Scott Keeter, for example, has found that of all voters, those who
                           watched television were the most likely to be influenced by the candidate’s
                           ‘image’. He accepted, however, that this may not be ‘a reaction to the
                           particular stimuli of televised politics – although such a direct effect is
                           plausible – as a more general increase in the importance of candidate factors
                           resulting from various political changes in which television has played a role’
                           (1987, p. 336). Recent research has been concerned with the impact of the
                           internet on political behaviour and processes. Brundidge and Rice, for
                           example, explore how use of the internet is related to other factors such as
                           social class and age, and how it is related to variables such as levels of
                           political participation and knowledge (2009). Chadwick and Howard’s
                           Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics (2009) contains that essay and a
                           further thirty articles on the growing role of the internet and online social
                           networking in political communication.



                                     THE EFFECT OF POLITICAL ADVERTISING

                           We noted above the importance of distinguishing between types of political
                           communication, such as election broadcasts and TV news interviews. If the
                           candidate’s image and personality (as perceived by the audience) is an important
                           factor in shaping voting behaviour so too, arguably, is the party’s political
                           advertising. As we shall see in Chapter 6, advertising is a major component of
                           modern political communication, consuming huge financial and creative
                           resources during and between elections. The fact of parties’ expenditure on
                           advertising might be thought to point to evidence that it works in shaping
                           behaviour. Such evidence is, however, conspicuously lacking.
                             Research cited by Diamond and Bates supports the ‘uses and gratifi-
                           cations’ thesis that the effects of political advertising (in which category we
                           include British party political broadcasts) are heavily conditioned by the
                           existing political attitudes of the audience. They note that ‘some supporters


                                                          33
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59