Page 137 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 137

AN INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

            an angry parent, who also happened to be a Labour supporter.
            Unfortunately, ‘Jennifer’s’ other parent, her mother, was a
            Conservative supporter, as was ‘Jennifer’s’ grandfather. Hearing of
            the use to be made of ‘Jennifer’s’ condition, they contacted the
            Conservative Party, and thus began a ‘war’, conducted amidst huge
            media attention, between rival claims as to the truth of ‘Jennifer’s’
            ear: was it the cynical manipulation of a child’s illness by unscrupulous
            (Labour) politicians, presented without context and understanding
            of the real situation, or was it a legitimate exposure of Tory health
            policy in action?
              As the ‘war’ progressed, giving the media their most extensively
            covered story of the campaign, it moved away from the debate on
            health to one of ethics, in which both parties’ campaign teams were
            implicated. The advertisement became a story in itself, over which
            the parties had little control. Labour’s ‘A Time for Change’ message
            was premature in 1992, and the Conservatives won a fourth
            consecutive general election, though with a much reduced majority.
            Although Labour’s communication apparatus was much more
            professional and ‘scientific’ than ever before, the political
            environment remained unsympathetic to its core message, and
            presentational errors on tax and other issues were enough to
            maintain majority support for the Tories. By the time of the 1997
            campaign, however, with Tony Blair installed as leader, and
            Conservative sleaze and infighting dominating the news agenda,
            electoral success and political power were within Labour’s reach
            for the first time in eighteen years. With further improvement of
            the communications machinery, and wholesale adoption of Clinton-
            style political advertising and marketing techniques, Labour’s
            advertising strategy in 1996–7 was simply to hold on to the huge
            lead in the opinion polls which it had established. Adapting the
            Clinton strategy of ‘triangulation’ to the British context, new Labour
            set out to steal the best Tory clothes, while retaining left-of-centre
            social democratic values, repositioning itself as the ‘radical centre’
            in British politics. The results of the strategy were seen in such ads
            as those depicting a British bulldog (a traditionally Tory symbol of
            a rather unpleasant and aggressive British nationalism), remaking
            it as a symbol of Labour’s ease with patriotism (albeit a humane,
            ethical patriotism compatible with socialist philosophy) (Figure 6.3).
            In this way, Labour developed a ‘brand’ capable of appealing
            to the large numbers of ‘soft’ Tory, affluent working- and
            middle-class voters who had kept the Conservatives in power for
            eighteen years, as well as their traditional supporters.

                                       120
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142