Page 179 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 179

AN INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

            (GUMG) in the 1970s, it was argued by trade unionists that the
            media—press and broadcasting—reported such issues from an
            inherently anti-labour, pro-capital perspective. Media accounts of
            the causes of industrial disputes, for example, tended to be dominated
            by management, while the viewpoints of the workforce were
            simplified and distorted.
              Perceiving this to be the case trade unions, like many other left-
            of-centre organisations with political agendas to pursue, came to
            view the media as ‘the enemy’ in an ongoing class struggle. To gain
            fair media coverage, it was argued, the left would have to build and
            sustain its own media channels, as was attempted unsuccessfully with
            the Daily News experiment in Scotland in the early 1970s (McKay
            and Barr, 1976), and the News on Sunday in 1986 (Chippindale and
            Horrie, 1988).
              Since the late 1970s, however, and especially since the election of
            the Thatcher government in 1979, trade unions have been obliged to
            reassess their relationship to the media, acknowledging that in
            addition to anti-labour biases (of which there undoubtedly were and
            remain many, particularly amongst the right-wing tabloids) there
            are also spaces and opportunities for media coverage which they can
            exploit.
              Nicholas Jones’s valuable study of the role played by the media in
            industrial disputes asserts that the coming of Thatcherism
            fundamentally transformed the environment within which they were
            pursued. In the period before Thatcher came to office—sometimes
            referred to as the era of ‘social democratic consensus’—unemployment
            was relatively low, Labour governments were a reality (as they became
            again, eighteen years after Thatcher first came to power), and
            organised labour enjoyed a certain degree of economic and hence
            political power, exemplified by its role in the downfall of Edward
            Heath in 1974, and the ‘winter of discontent’ in 1978–9 which
            eventually destroyed the Labour government of James Callaghan.
            Industrial relations legislation permitted effective solidarity action,
            such as mass picketing, which allowed workers in dispute to believe
            that they had some chance of success if confrontation with employers
            became necessary. Employers, for their part, had incentives to seek
            agreement with workers in dispute, since strikes and other forms of
            action could be long and costly.
              After 1979 all this changed. The Thatcher government pursued a
            policy of driving up unemployment to levels not seen in Britain since
            the 1930s. It introduced wave after wave of anti-labour legislation,
            designed to make effective combined and solidarity action increasingly

                                       162
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184