Page 174 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 174

PRESSURE GROUP POLITICS

            marginal political actors, and sometimes at the cost of real political
            power. In other cases, a ‘dominant account’ or interpretation of
            events has had to be revised to accommodate alternative or
            oppositional views.
              The Nixon administration’s withdrawal from the Vietnam War
            was one such example. In this case radical change was forced on a
            policy sponsored by the United States politico-military establishment
            by a combination of pressure-group and journalistic activity (see
            Chapter 9). The British Conservative government’s 1980s retreat on
            the ‘poll tax’ (the refusal to retreat being an important factor in
            Margaret Thatcher’s removal from office and replacement by John
            Major) was occasioned not least by a groundswell of public opposition
            to the policy, focussed on pressure groups of greater or lesser
            extremism, and reported widely in the media (Deacon and Golding,
            1994). The experience of the Major government after its election
            victory of 1992 was one of constant challenge to its policy content
            and style, in stark contrast to the 1980s, when ‘Thatcherism’ was
            presumed to have become consensual. In Italy, as the tangentopoli
            scandal emerged in 1993, an entire generation of politicians from all
            parties was brought down by popular opinion.
              The causes of these political shifts, and the contexts in which they
            occurred, are of course very different. They all, however, highlight
            the weaknesses of any theoretical framework which asserts the
            existence of a deep structural bias on the part of the media towards
            ‘the powerful’, ‘the establishment’, or ‘the ruling class’ in modern
            capitalist societies. Greek sociologist Nicos Poulantzas long ago
            rejected, from a Marxist standpoint, the notion, of a ‘ruling class’ as
            a meaningful political entity, preferring to think in terms of ‘class
            fractions’, and alliances of class fractions, whose influence rose and
            fell as economic and social circumstances changed.  Thus, one could
                                                       1
            identify the influence of ‘finance capital’ in 1980s Britain, and the
            relative political impotence of ‘manufacturing capital’. Some
            observers have argued that the sudden political demise of Margaret
            Thatcher in 1990 can be viewed partly in terms of the reassertion of
            British manufacturing capital in the context of a government whose
            opposition to the concept of European union was endangering future
            markets and prosperity. The same Conservative hostility to European
            union has been cited as one explanation for the shift in business
            support to Labour from 1994 onwards (in addition to the political
            communication factors discussed already).
              If economic classes (in the Marxist sense) can be divided, and
            have contradictory political interests, so too the members of political

                                       157
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179