Page 170 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 170

POLITICAL PUBLIC RELATIONS

                 Press officers speak as frankly as they feel able to members
                 [of the Lobby], either individually or collectively, on a
                 background basis: i.e., the journalist does not identify his
                 source precisely in writing his story… This method of
                 communication with journalists is universally practised
                 in government and other circles the world over as a means
                 of opening up the relationship [between government and
                 media].
                                                     (1991, p.158)

              Critics dispute both Ingham’s optimistic reading of the Lobby’s
            impact on government—media relations, and his assertion of its
            ‘universality’. In Robert Harris’s view:

                 by the late 1970s, most countries had a straightforward
                 government spokesman—a political appointee who would
                 brief the press, appear on radio and television, and
                 promote the official line. But in Britain, the spokesman
                 was not only anonymous: he acted in accordance with
                 quasimasonic rules drawn up in Queen Victoria’s time. A
                 system which had been designed to preserve the
                 quintessentially English atmosphere of a gentleman’s club
                 had been imported into the television age.
                                                      (1991, p.82)

              The main criticism of this system of non-attributable media
            briefings was that it permitted manipulation of journalists by
            politicians to a degree that is unhealthy for and damaging to the
            democratic process. Cockerell  et al. argue that ‘its secretiveness
            mirrors the secrecy that surrounds so much of government in
            Whitehall and allows the government of the day to present its own
            unchallenged version of reality’ (1984, p.42). This it can do simply
            because journalists are forced to respect the rules, or face exclusion
            from the system and the valuable information it supplies. In the
            extremely competitive environment of the contemporary media
            industry this is not a realistic option, although the Guardian and the
            Independent voluntarily withdrew for a period in the 1980s, in the
            hope (unfulfilled) that change to the system would follow.
              When, for example, Margaret Thatcher wished to leak damaging
            information about ministerial colleagues who had fallen from favour,
            she frequently employed Ingham, and the Lobby system, to do it, in
            the knowledge that nothing said in briefings could be attributed to

                                       153
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175