Page 60 - An Introduction to Political Communication Second Edition
P. 60

THE EFFECTS OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

              From this perspective, the notion that democracy has anything to
            do with rationality and ‘public interest’ is an illusion, since we choose
            our politics on the same grounds, and as a result of the application
            of the same techniques of persuasion as we choose our toothpaste.
            As Nicholas Garnham puts it in his discussion of the public sphere,
            the rise of political advertising and public relations expresses ‘the
            direct control of private or state interests of the flow of public
            information in the interest, not of rational discourse, but of
            manipulation’ (1986, p.41). The rational citizen of classic liberal
            theory has become ‘a consumer of politics and policies…the
            competing political parties [present] electors with different policy
            options in broadly the same way as firms [offer] rival products to
            the consumers’ (Greenaway et al., 1992, p.51).


                       POLITICS AND THE POST-MODERN


            To this argument about the trivialisation of politics and the expulsion
            of rational discourse from the process may be added the ‘post-
            modernist’ variant, in which political communication is viewed as
            the one-way exchange of empty signifiers and meaningless messages
            across a barren media landscape. An early pioneer of this apocalyptic
            view was Daniel Boorstin who, as noted in Chapter 2, coined the
            term ‘pseudo-event’ in response to what he saw as the increasing
            tendency of the mass media to be preoccupied with unreal,
            unauthentic, manufactured ‘happenings’, or ‘synthetic novelties’. His
            definition of a pseudo-event contained the following elements:

                 a) It is not spontaneous, but comes about because someone
                 has planned, planted or incited it; b) It is planted primarily
                 for the immediate purpose of being reported or
                 reproduced. Therefore, its occurrence is arranged for the
                 convenience of the media. Its success is measured by how
                 widely it is reported. Time relations in it are more
                 commonly fictitious than factitious; c) Its relation to the
                 underlying reality of the situation is ambiguous; d) Usually
                 it is intended to be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
                                                      (1962, p.11)

              The phenomenon of the pseudo-event was, as already noted,
            directly associated with the rise of the mass media in the nineteenth
            century and their growing need to fill space (and later, broadcasting

                                       43
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65