Page 204 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 204

PRESSURE-GROUP POLITICS

               Lebanon in the 1980s against US and other Western targets fell into
               this  category,  as  have  the  recent  wave  of  suicide  bombings
               unleashed by Palestinians against civilians in Israel. The September
               11,  2001  attacks  by  members  of  the  al-Quaida  network  were
               intended to send a statement to Western governments and popu-
               lations, but also to like-minded Islamic fundamentalists the world
               over – look how easy it is to strike at the heart of US power. As TV
               viewers all over the world watched in horror, hi-jacked aircraft were
               flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York,
               a universally recognised symbol of American and global capitalism,
               and  also  into  the  Pentagon,  the  symbolic  centre  of  America’s
               military power. A fourth plane, it is believed, was intended to strike
               at the White House, the Capitol building, or some other symbol of
               American democracy, but crashed or was shot down before it could
               reach its target. Shocking events in themselves and damaging as they
               were  to  the  American  and  global  economies,  these  attacks,  like
               other  acts  of  terrorism  before  them,  were  intended  to  be  read
               primarily  as  political  statements,  communicated  to  a  global
               audience through the medium of live, rolling TV news to which,
               by  September  2001,  virtually  every  country  on  the  planet  had
               access. September 11 staged Baudrillard’s Theatre of Cruelty in a
               truly global arena. In doing so, al-Quaida was implementing on a
               qualitatively new level a communicative strategy long employed by
               insurgents and oppositionists throughout the world.
                 Terrorist activity will tend to shock and outrage the community
               against  which  it  is  directed,  generating  a  public  response  which
               may suit the organisation’s objectives in so far as it radicalises and
               polarises  public  opinion.  The  many  IRA  bomb  attacks  against
               civilians  in  Britain  were  intended  to  generate  public  support  for
               British military and political withdrawal from Northern Ireland, a
               strategy which has not been without success.
                 Terrorist activity may also be consciously designed to provoke
               repressive counter-measures by the state, enabling the organisation
               and  the  community  whose  interests  it  claims  to  represent  to  be
               portrayed as victims. The IRA bombings of pubs in Birmingham
               in  the  1970s  led  both  to  the  introduction  of  the  Prevention  of
               Terrorism  Act  and  the  miscarriages  of  justice  experienced  by
               the  ‘Birmingham  Six’  and  others.  Both  generated  much  adverse
               publicity for the British police and legal system. Similarly, the 1988
               ban on broadcast statements by supporters of republican violence
               such as Sinn Fein generated much negative publicity for the British
               government, at home and abroad.


                                          183
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209