Page 78 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 78

THE POLITICAL MEDIA

               are expected to express them. In a pluralist democracy, ideally, those
               opinions should reflect the structure of partisanship in the society as
               a  whole,  serving  diversity  and  promoting  rational  debate,  in  the
               public interest, between distinct viewpoints. Historically, of course,
               the great majority of British newspapers have supported one party
               – the Conservatives, a pattern of bias which peaked in the early
               1990s.  Table  4.1  shows  the  party  political  affiliations  of  each
               national newspaper at the 1992 general election. Of twenty daily
               and  Sunday  titles,  six  supported  the  Labour  Party,  two  declined
               to declare a preference, and twelve supported the Conservatives.
               The Tory-supporting press accounted for 70 per cent of national
               newspaper  circulation  in  total,  as  compared  to  Labour’s  27  per
               cent.  This  pro-Conservative  bias,  consistent  with  the  pattern  of
               press partisanship throughout the twentieth century, was in sharp
               contrast both to the spread of votes in the election (the Tories took
               41 per cent of the total votes, compared to Labour’s 37 per cent and
               the Liberal Democrats’ 20 per cent) and, in some cases, such as that
               of the Daily Star, to the declared party preferences of the readers. 3
               Thus the Star, whose readers are predominantly Labour supporters,
               took an aggressively anti-Labour editorial stance. For this reason,
               the press have been viewed by many as instruments of ideological
               indoctrination, in the service of the wealthiest and most powerful
               of  Britain’s  political  parties.  Chinks  in  the  armour,  such  as  the
               Financial  Times’  tentative  endorsement  of  the  Labour  Party  in
               1992, were viewed as the exceptions which proved the rule. Events
               since 1992 have challenged that perception, however. For reasons
               which I discuss in more detail elsewhere (McNair, 2000), the ‘Tory
               press’,  as  it  was  once  quite  justifiably  described,  began  to  shift
               its  editorial  allegiances  after  1994.  Sleaze  (moral  and  political  –
               the  cash-for-questions  scandal  mainly  concerned  Tory  MPs)
               surrounding the governing party; the emergence of a remodelled
               Labour Party with the election of Tony Blair as leader in 1994; and
               Labour’s sustained courting of the press in the run-up to the 1997
               poll,  all  contributed  to  a  structure  of  editorial  bias  which  was
               almost the exact reverse of that prevailing in 1992 (see Table 4.2).
               This time, only seven daily and Sunday titles urged their readers to
               vote for the Conservatives, while eleven backed Labour. The Sun
               and  the  Star in  particular,  both  traditionally  Tory  ‘cheerleaders’,
               came out for Labour.
                 That  the  overwhelming  majority  of  the  British  press  have
               consistently supported the party of big business is not seriously in
               dispute. What has changed since 1992 is the readiness of the still


                                          57
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83