Page 99 - Analog Circuit Design Art, Science, and Personalities
P. 99

Propagation of the Race (of Analog Circuit Designers)


                             Subjects that provide the background essential for design are offered by all of our
                           departments. An excellent example is the widely acclaimed Introduction to Design
                           architected by Professor Woodie Flowers of the department of Mechanical Engi-
                           neering. The culmination of this subject is a spirited contest that finds which student-
                           designed machine best accomplishes a specific task. Although Introduction to Design
                           and many other M.I.T. courses would provide interesting examples of approaches
                           to teaching design skills, 1 will limit this discussion to those subjects with which 1
                           am involved and which I have taught several times. The sub.jects described have
                           evolved to their current form and content via the contributions, suggestions, teach-
                           ing, and inspiration of many colleagues, including Professors Hae-Seung Lee,
                           Leonard A. Gould, Winston R. Markey, and Campbell L. Searle, and Drs. Chathan
                           M. Cooke, Thomas H. Lee, and F. Williams Sales, Jr.
                             Engineering education at M.I.T. and elsewhere started a fundamental change in
                           the 1950s because of the pioneering effort led by Professor Gordon S. Brown, then
                           head of M.T.T.’s department of Electrical Engineering. Prior to that time, engineer-
                           ing education was generally quite specific, with options that channeled the student
                           into a narrow area early in his or her educational process. However, the technolog-
                           ical explosion that followed the second world war made it impossible to predict
                           areas likely to be of interest even at graduation, much less a few years later. The
                           approach that evolved from this dilemma was to provide an education broadly
                           based in mathematics and physics. Regardless of the opportunities available to the
                           graduate. the truths discovered by Fourier, Maxwell, and Laplace would be essen-
                           tial. The new engineer would have a background that permitted easy assimilation
                           of the specifics of any particular area, including design.
                             A further justification for this approach is that analytic skills are the ones most
                           difficult to acquire through self-study, with the discipline and structure provided
                           by the classroom almost required for success. Few high school students study
                           vector calculus on their own because of the joy it provides. Conversely, hobbies
                           or acquired interests often lead students to “thing”-oriented pursuits such as circuit
                           or computer hacking long before they get to college.
                             It is impossible to argue with the general success that this approach to education
                           has enjoyed. However, the potential negative impact on the propagation of the race
                           of designers comes when a student spends 4 or 6 or 8 years (depending on the final
                           degree obtained) in an academic program devoid of hardware and design experi-
                           ence. While this student could become an innovative and productive design engi-
                           neer with a very short internship in a specific area, he or she may not ~’clnt to. This
                           bias is particularly likely when none of the academic role models practice design.
                             The three subjects to be described provide a degree of balance by exploring de-
                           sign-oriented specifics and philosophies. It really doesn’t matter if an occasional
                           specific is obsolete when the student leaves M.I.T. The generalized background
                           acquired from other subjects allows easy adaptation for the student whose career
                           has been motivated in this direction. The subjects are electives and thus acquire
                           their enrollment only because of residual interest from earlier, often pre-M.I.T.,
                           experiences or because of a favorable student grapevine.
                             These subjects share a number of features. All have an associated laboratory,
                           with students averaging approximately 2 hours per week in this endeavor. While the
                           details of the laboratory vary depending on the subject. all reflect our belief that it is
                           essential to attempt actual design in order to learn how to do it. None demands
                           much literary effort in the final write up (not because we don’t think this aspect is
                           important-but   we prefer to exercise other skills in the limited time available). All
                           laboratory exercises require close interaction between the student and a teaching


           80
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104