Page 175 - Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes, Third Edition
P. 175

Ratio of Reaction Rates = exp[-E/R{1/T  – 1/T }]
                                                                                1
                                                                        2
                                                               = exp[148100/8.314{1/673 – 1/873}] = 430


                    The size of a reactor would increase by nearly three orders of magnitude if the reaction were carried out
                    at 400°C (the critical temperature for materials selection, Table 6.1) rather than 600°C. Clearly the effect
                    of temperature is significant.


                    Most reactions are not kinetically controlled as is the case here. In most cases the rate is controlled by
                    heat  or  mass  transfer  considerations.  These  are  not  as  sensitive  to  temperature  changes  as  chemical
                    reaction rates. For more detail, see Chapter 20.


                    High-Pressure  Concern  (see Table  6.2).      For  gas  phase  reactions,  the  concentration  of  reactants  is
                    proportional  to  the  pressure.  For  a  situation  where  the  reaction  rate  is  directly  proportional  to  the
                    concentration, operation at 25 bar rather than at 1 bar would increase the reaction rate by a factor of 25
                    (assuming  ideal  gas  behavior). Although  we  do  not  know  that  the  rate  is  directly  proportional  to  the
                    concentration, we can predict that the effect of pressure is likely to be substantial, and the reactor size
                    will be substantially reduced.


                    Non-stoichiometric  Feed  (see Table  6.3).      The  reactor  feed  contains  both  excess  hydrogen  and  the
                    reaction product methane.


                    Methane in the Feed.   The effect of methane is to reduce the reactant concentrations. This decreases the
                    reaction rate and represents a negative impact. The methane could possibly reduce the formation of side
                    products, but we have no information to suggest that this is the case.


                    Excess  Hydrogen  in  the  Feed.      The  large  amount  of  excess  hydrogen  in  the  feed  ensures  that  the
                    concentration  of  hydrogen  will  remain  large  throughout  the  reactor.  This  increases  the  reaction  rate.
                    Although there is no information provided regarding the decision to maintain the high hydrogen levels, it
                    may be linked to reducing the formation of side products.


                    With the exception of the presence of methane product in the feed, the high-temperature operation, the
                    excess hydrogen, and the elevated pressure all support an increase in reaction rate and a reduction in
                    reactor volume. This suggests that the catalyst is not “hot”—that is, the catalyst is still operating in the
                    reaction-controlled regime and mass transfer effects have not started to intrude. For these conditions, the
                    manipulation of temperatures and pressures is essential to limit the reactor size.


                    There is a significant economic penalty for using more than 400% excess hydrogen in the reactor feed.
                    The raw material cost of hydrogen would be reduced significantly if excess hydrogen were not used. The
                    fact that this large excess is used in spite of the economic penalty involved suggests that the hydrogen
                    plays an important role in the prevention of side products. The concept of selectivity is discussed further
                    in Chapter 20.


                    The presence of methane in the feed has not yet been resolved. At best it behaves as an inert and occupies
                    volume that must be handled downstream of the reactor, thus making all the equipment larger and more
                    expensive. This question is considered in more detail in Example 6.6.


                    Example 6.6
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180