Page 357 - Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes, Third Edition
P. 357

You are given an assignment that involves writing a report that is to be completed and presented
                          in  two  weeks.  You  work  diligently  and  feel  confident  you  have  come  up  with  a  respectable
                          solution.  You  present  the  written  report  personally  to  your  director  (boss),  who  asks  you  to
                          summarize only your final conclusions. Immediately after providing this information, your boss
                          declares that “your results must be wrong” and returns your report unopened and unread.



                          You return to your desk angry. Your comprehensive and well-written report was not even opened
                          and read. Your boss did not tell you what was wrong, and you did not receive any “partial credit”
                          for all your work. After a while, you cool off and review your report. You find that you had made a
                          “simple” error, causing your answer to be off by an order of magnitude. You correct the error
                          and turn in a revised report.



                          What remains is the nagging question, “How could your boss know you made an error without
                          having reviewed your report or asking any questions?”



                    The  answer  to  this  nagging  question  is  probably  a  direct  result  of  your  director’s  experience  with  a
                    similar problem or knowledge of some guideline that contradicted your answer. The ability of your boss
                    to  transfer  personal  experience  to  new  situations  is  one  reason  why  he  or  she  was  promoted  to  that
                    position.


                          It is important to be able to apply knowledge gained through experience to future problems.


                    11.1.1 Introduction to Technical Heuristics and Shortcut Methods





                    A heuristic is a statement concerning equipment sizes, operating conditions, and equipment performance
                    that reduces the need for calculations. A shortcut method replaces the need for extensive calculations in

                    order to evaluate equipment sizes, operating conditions, and equipment performance. These are referred
                    to as “back-of-the-envelope calculations.” In this text, we refer to both of these experience-based tools as
                    guidelines or heuristics.


                    The guidelines provided in this chapter are limited to materials specifically covered in this text (including
                    problems at the end of the chapters). All such material is likely to be familiar to final year B.S. chemical
                    engineering  students  and  new  graduates  as  a  result  of  their  education.  Upon  entering  the  work  force,
                    engineers will develop guidelines that apply specifically to their area of responsibility.


                    Guidelines and heuristics must be applied with an understanding of their limitations. In most cases, a
                    novice chemical engineer should have sufficient background to apply the rules provided in this text.


                    The narrative started earlier is now revisited. The assignment remains the same; however, the approach to
                    solving the problem changes.

                          Before  submitting  your  report,  you  apply  a  heuristic  that  highlights  an  inconsistency  in  your

                          initial results. You then review your calculations, find the error, and make corrections before
   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362