Page 48 - Applied Petroleum Geomechanics
P. 48

Rock physical and mechanical properties  39


              2.2.2 Depth-dependent porosity and normal compaction
              Field tests and lab experiments have shown that rock porosity decreases as
              the burial depth increases. The following equation, first proposed by Athy
              (1930), is the most commonly used one to describe porosity and depth
              relationship:

                                          f ¼ ae  bZ                     (2.14)
              where a and b are constants; Z is the depth; a ¼ f 0 ; and f 0 is the porosity
              when Z is zero. For example, in the Northern North Sea the constants are
              a ¼ 0.49 and b ¼ 2.7   10  4  for sandstones and a ¼ 0.803 and
                          4
              b ¼ 5.1   10  for shales, if Z is in meters (Schön, 1996).
                 Zhang and Wieseneck (2011) analyzed the porosity data measured from
              wireline density logs in several wells of the Bossier and Haynesville shale gas
              formations in North Louisiana and obtained the following relation in
              normally compacted shales:
                                       f ¼ 0:5e  0:00036Z                (2.15)

              where f is in fractions; Z is the true vertical depth in feet.
                 Athy’s compaction equation indicates that porosity reduces exponen-
              tially with depth because of normal compaction of the formations, causing
              formations to be more compacted and consolidated. Porosity is not only
              dependent on depth (decreasing with depth) but also controlled by different
              mudstone mineralogy (Mondol et al., 2007). The smectite, compared to
              other clay minerals, has the largest porosity and is less compacted (the curve
              19 in Fig. 2.5). It can be also observed in Fig. 2.5 that the normal
              compaction trends are very different for different shales, and this behavior is
              particularly important when one uses normal compaction trends for pore
              pressure prediction.

              2.2.3 Stress-dependent porosity
              Lab experimental tests show that rock porosity decreases as the applied
              stress increases. For example, lab measurements in sandstone specimens
              cored 1000 m below the sea floor (Peng and Zhang, 2007) show that the
              stress and porosity have a negative exponential relation, i.e.,
                                      f ¼ 0:336e  0:0023s                (2.16)

              where f is the porosity (fraction); s is the axial stress (MPa).
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53