Page 263 - Applied Probability
P. 263

11. Radiation Hybrid Mapping
                              250
                                           Interlocus Distances for the Best Order
                                               108.7
                                                     17.4
                                                                 11.9
                                                                        12.5
                                                           37.9
                                             1 —— 2 —— 3 —— 4 —— 5 —— 6
                              The total map length between locus 1 and locus 6 is b = 188.4 cR under
                              this order. In the Bayesian analyses, b was increased to 200 cR to determine
                              a prior interval length of  7×200  = 280 cR. Interlocus distances based on the
                                                      5
                              posterior mode then give a total map length of only 176.5 cR. Apparently,
                              imposition of a tight prior tends to decrease estimated interlocus distances.
                              11.11 Problems
                                 1. For m loci in a haploid clone with no missing observations, the ex-
                                   pected number of obligate breaks E[B(id)] is given by expression
                                   (11.2).
                                    (a) Under the correct order, show [1] that
                                                                 m−1               m−1
                                                                 	                  	   2
                                        Var[B(id)]  =  2r(1 − r)    θ i,i+1 − 2r(1 − r)  θ
                                                                                        i,i+1
                                                                 i=1                i=1
                                                                 m−2 m−1
                                                                                             !

                                                                2
                                                       +(1 − 2r)          θ i,i+1 θ j,j+1 (1 − θ i+1,j ) ,
                                                                 i=1 j=i+1
                                        where the breakage probability θ i+1,j = 0 when i+1 = j. (Hint:
                                        Let S i be the indicator of whether a break has occurred between
                                        loci i and i + 1. Verify that
                                                                                         2
                                            E(S i S j )= r(1 − r)θ i,i+1 θ j,j+1 [1 − θ i+1,j (1 − 2r) ]
                                        by considering four possible cases consistent with S i S j = 1. The
                                        first case is characterized by retention at locus i, nonretention
                                        at locus i + 1, retention at locus j, and nonretention at locus
                                        j +1.)
                                    (b) The above expression for Var[B(id)] can be simplified in the
                                        Poisson model by noting that
                                                                    j−1

                                                               =       (1 − θ k,k+1 ).
                                                     1 − θ i+1,j
                                                                   k=i+1
                                        Using this last identity, argue by induction that

                                                        m−2 m−1

                                                                θ i,i+1 θ j,j+1 (1 − θ i+1,j )
                                                        i=1 j=i+1
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268