Page 181 - Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything
P. 181

The Value of Information and the Internet of Things  167


              such as would be the case of the information provided by AI-enabled IoT,
              the theoretical handling of clairvoyance changes. We see, as did Howard,
              that knowledge about L is more important than knowledge about C when
              it comes to maximizing EðVjbÞ. But we have shown that a knowledge of C in
              a bid guarantees that a bidder will never have a negative expected profit.
              Therefore, the VoI depends on what one is trying to do, or the contextual
              objective. This qualitative consideration must be kept in mind for future
              research on VoI. Existing work from the sensor network domain, specifi-
              cally on QoI, and VoI may provide quantitative measures that can form a
              probabilistic derivative VoI.
                 We explained the relevance of our approach in this chapter’s section on
              IoT and AI. We have taken the opportunity to adjust Howard’s seminal the-
              ory to provide an extended foundation for the VoI theory in the IoT. One
              must keep in mind that AI techniques, such as machine learning and artificial
              reasoning, when employed in the IoT for self-star system behaviors, will
              require additional consideration for managing information provided to a
              human or machine decision maker. While we continued with Howard’s
              “market” context in this chapter for its explainability and theoretic continu-
              ity, our future work will examine the implications of our theoretical VoI
              guarantee, described herein, in an IoT-specific experimental simulation
              or empirical study, that incorporates semantic notions of QoI.


              ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
              The authors acknowledge the assistance of Swmbo Heilizer. The authors also thank William
              F. Lawless for his careful reading of the draft version of this chapter and his helpful
              suggestions.


              REFERENCES
              Allwein, G. (2004). A qualitative framework for Shannon information theories. In: Proceed-
                 ings of the 2004 workshop on new security paradigms (pp. 23–31). ACM.
              Babaoglu, O., Jelasity, M., Montresor, A., Fetzer, C., Leonardi, S., van Moorsel, A., & van
                 Steen, M. (2005). The self-star vision. In: In Self-star properties in complex information systems
                 (p. 397).
              Baker, J., Song, J., & Jones, D. R. (2017). Closing the loop: Empirical evidence for a positive
                 feedback model of IT business value creation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,
                 26(2), 142–160.
              Barnaghi, P., Sheth, A., & Henson, C. (2013). From data to actionable knowledge: Big Data
                 challenges in the web of things [Guest Editors’ Introduction]. IEEE Intelligent Systems,
                 28(6), 6–11.
              Barwise, J., & Seligman, J. (1997). Information flow: The logic of distributed systems: Vol. 44.
                 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186