Page 101 - Artificial Intelligence in the Age of Neural Networks and Brain Computing
P. 101

References     89




                  the old philosophical question: What is reality? The human brain is not only able to
                  perceive what is called objective reality, but also can create new reality. It is a
                  hermeneutic device.
                     “Can complexity scientists bridge, in the words of C. P. Snow, the two cultures of
                  academiadthe humanities and the sciencesdto create a more thoroughgoing
                  explanation of human cognition? Can the tools of hermeneutics, mathematics, and
                  computer simulation be integrated to assemble better and more useful models of
                  human social understanding than that currently exist? These are the two provocative
                  and ambitious questionsdthe former the broader, and the latter the more specificd
                  that frame the intent and focus of Klu ¨ver and Klu ¨ver’s recent book Social
                  Understanding,” see Refs. [52,53].
                     Somewhat parallelly with the arguments of this paperdthe action-perception
                  cycledhaving been motivated by Walter Freeman’s findings and theory [36,54]
                  Robert Kozma is working on understanding the neural mechanisms, the intentional
                  perception-action cycle [55,56]. It is stated that knowledge and meaning is created in
                  the brain by a circular intentional dynamics, where “meaningful stimulus is selected
                  by the subject and the cerebral cortex creates the structures and dynamics necessary
                  for intentional behavior and decision-making.”
                     What we see is that the mathematics of hermeneutics and of the intentional must
                  be somewhat different from what we use to describe the physical world. Frameworks
                  of mathematical models of complex systems and of cognitive systems should be
                  unified by elaborating algorithms of neural and mental hermeneutics. But this will
                  be a different story.



                  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
                  A preliminary version of this chapter has been published as a CEUR-WS.org paper. PE thanks
                  the Henry Luce Foundation to let him to be a Henry R Luce Professor. “Thank you” for the
                  reviewer for the constructive comments.



                  REFERENCES
                   [1] B.F. Skinner, About Behaviorism, Knopf, New York, 1974.
                   [2] P.S. Churchland, Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-brain, The
                      MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1986.
                   [3] J.J. Smart, Physicalism and emergence, Neuroscience 6 (1981) 109e113.
                   [4] M. Bunge, The Mind-body Problem, Pergamon Press, 1980.
                   [5] T.W. Deacon, Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, W.W. Norton &
                      Company, New York, 2011.
                   [6] K.R. Popper, J.C. Eccles, The Self and Its Brain, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1977.
                   [7] J. Bickle, Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account, Kluwer
                      Acad/Publ., 2003.
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106