Page 173 - Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS)
P. 173

158  AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS



                                substantiated requires significant efforts on the part of the project develop-
                                ment team.
                              • Optional requirements: if optional requirements were part of the SOW and
                                the requirements spec, these must be evaluated as to cost, time required, and
                                overall benefit to the project.

                              The purchaser should avoid overspecifying the system, but understand that if
                              you do not specify something, you will get the default COTS capability in that
                              area. For instance, if you state that the “system SHALL provide a latent case
                              management system,” you cannot then fail the vendor at acceptance test time
                              when the latent case system turns out to be more basic and limited than you
                              had imagined. The alternative is to include a rated requirement for a latent
                              case management system (LCMS), add a proposal preparation requirement
                              that the vendors submit their COTS LCMS documentation, and then rate the
                              depth and quality of that documentation.
                                 As previously noted, requirements specs must be clear, complete, and unam-
                              biguous. To ensure that they meet all of these requirements, it is useful if
                              the document itself is highly structured and formatted to incorporate the
                              following:

                              • A list of assumptions that have been made by the project development team
                                in preparing the requirements specification.
                              • A list of compliance standards that must be met by the vendors, e.g., national
                                or local requirements for electrical standards, image compression and trans-
                                mission, etc.
                              • A description of the expected users of the system.
                              • Requirements that must be met by the vendor should be contained in sepa-
                                rate SHALL statements. For example: “The card scan workflow SHALL
                                permit an operator to adjust the contrast/brightness of a fingerprint image
                                during the quality control process.”
                              • Each requirement, and each informational statement, should be individually
                                numbered to allow the proposal reviewers to track compliance with each of
                                the requirements.


                              7.6 DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT PHASE
                              For the development and deployment phase, the basic questions in our deci-
                              sion tree include the following:

                              • How well is the vendor performing the SOW tasks?
                                • Are they on schedule?
                                • Do they understand the nuances of your needs?
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178