Page 250 - Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS)
P. 250

CONTRACTUAL ISSUES REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF AN AFIS            235



          System. The government seeks the broadest promise possible, while the vendor
          seeks to limit its promise (or at least the fiscal consequences of its promise). In
          general, the indemnification clause provides that the vendor will cover the gov-
          ernment’s liability or expenses due to claims of personal injury or property
          damage arising from the contractual commodities or services or from the fault
          or negligence of the vendor. The clause will include specific notification
          requirements (such as immediate notification or notification within a certain
          time period as a condition of indemnification) and identify the roles of the
          parties with respect to the litigation.
            In light of the government’s business needs to continue using the intellec-
          tual property in the System, additional clauses may be needed in the contract.
          An intellectual property indemnification clause protects the government from
          claims based on allegations that the software or other System components
          infringe a patent, copyright, trade secret, or other property rights. Such alle-
          gations often seek to prevent further use by the government. Depending on
          the nature of the AFIS application, continued use could be critical. In order to
          mitigate this potential risk, the government should seek to contractually obli-
          gate the vendor to secure the rights for continued use of the allegedly infring-
          ing property or to provide acceptable replacements. In AFIS applications with
          significant numbers of interfaces, consideration should also be given to pro-
          tecting the government’s investment in the interfaces in the event that the
          underlying intellectual property rights are challenged.
            Identification of who owns intellectual property employed in the System may
          be beneficial in certain circumstances. While not a step undertaken during the
          RFP, it may be valuable during the contract negotiations stage. It may identify
          possible problematic areas and will provide additional information to use when
          developing the listing of materials to be included in an escrow or that must be
          addressed outside the escrow (such as third party software that the vendor will
          not be able to include in its escrow).

          9.7.6.10 Termination Clauses
          Statutory requirements, control agency requirements, and advice of legal
          counsel will generally determine the contractual bases for terminating the con-
          tract between the parties. In an AFIS acquisition, the government may also wish
          to incorporate the ability to terminate a specific phase of the project (but not
          the entire contract) or the entire project if acceptance testing cannot be met
          within a defined period or number of tries.

          9.7.6.11 Contractual Means for Keeping Issues in Front of the Vendor
          Vendors often create and host user groups for their product lines. There are
          benefits on both sides. User groups allow the vendor to obtain customer input
   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255