Page 68 - Basics of Fluid Mechanics and Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
P. 68

Dynamics  of Inviscid  Fluids                                                               53



                 THEOREM  2.1.  The  rotation  (vorticity)  flux  across  a  certain  part  of
              a  fluid  surface  (which  is  watched  during  its  motion)  is  constant.
                 As  direct  consequences  of  this  theorem  we  have  the  following  results
              which  can  be  proved  by  “reductio  ad  absurdum”’:
                 -  A fluid  surface  %,  which  at  a  certain  instant  ¢g  is  arotation  (vorticity)
              surface  will  preserve  this  quality  all  the  time,  i.e.,  it  will  be  a  rotation
              (vorticity)  surface  during  the  motion.           A  similar  result  could  also  be

             formulated  for  the  vorticity  (rotation)  lines,  these  lines  being  defined  as
              the  intersection  of  two  vorticity  (rotation)  surfaces;
                 -  If,  at  a  certain  moment,  the  fluid  flow  is  irrotational  (potential),
              then  this  quality  will  be  kept  at  any  later  moment.
                 This  last  result,  known  as  the  Lagrange  theorem  and  which  1s  valid  in
             the  above  mentioned  hypotheses,  could  be  obtained  either  by  reductio  ad
             absurdum  (supposing  that  the  flux  of  rotation  across  a  certain  surface,

              with  w  4  0,  would  be  different  from  zero  which  leads  obviously  to  a
              contradiction)  or  by  remarking  that  the  equation  th  (+)  =  (gradv)  >


             has  the  solution  (in  Lagrangian  coordinates) @ a=  ORF  ot  ,  where  wo  (we)
                                                                                     oo

              is  the  vorticity  vector  at  the  moment  fg  and  p  =  pg  is Pte  mass  density
              at  the  same  moment.
                 If  the  fluid  flow  is  rotational,  then  there  will  be  a  velocity  potential
              ®  such  that  v  =  grad®.  As  2 ot  =  grad,  from  Euler’s  equation  in
              Helmholtz  form,  in  the  same  hypotheses  of  a  barotropic  fluid  and  of  the
             conservative  character  of  the  external  forces,  we  also  get




                                               Ob      ov?        dp
                                      grad (7 De  +5+/2-                    }  = 0.




                 In  other  words,  in  an  irrotational  flow  of  an  inviscid  barotropic  fluid
              with  external  forces  coming  from  a  potential  U,  we  have  2 Sr P40 ey  J4 ap  _

              U  =  C(t),  where  C(t) is  a  function  depending  only  on  time  (in  the  steady
              case  this  function  becomes  a  constant,  which  does  not  change  its  value
              in  the  whole  fluid  domain).  This  result,  known  as  the  second  Bernoulli
              theorem  (integral)  could  be  also  extended  in  the  case  of  a  rotational
              fluid  flow.  Precisely,  by  considering  the  inner  product  of  both  sides  of
              Euler’s  equation  with  v,  we  will  have  that  pZe  +pv-gradK  =  0,where
                      2       d.
              K=5+f?-U.

                 If  the  flow  is  steady,  then  we  will  have  at  once  v-  gradK  =  2&  =0,
                                                                                                  Dt  ~
               e.,  the  quantity  K  =  we  +f ap  —  U  is  constant  at  any  path  line,  the
              value  of  this  constant  being  different  when  we  change  the  trajectory.

              This  last  result  is  known  as  the  first  Bernoulli  theorem  (integral).
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73