Page 72 - Basics of Fluid Mechanics and Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
P. 72

Dynamics  of Inviscid  Fluids                                                                57


              smooth  hypersurface  I  (for  ¢  >  0)  which  has  a  common  border  with  the

              domain  wo.  Let  also  €  =  (£0,£1,  €2,€3)  be  the  outward  unit  normal  to  Lr.
              It  is  proved  that  the  uniqueness  of  U  in  2Q  is  intimately  linked  with  the
              hyperbolicity  of  the  Euler  equations  which  requires  the  fulfilment  of  the
              following  complimentary  hypothesis:  at  each  point  of  the  hypersurface
              I  the  inequality


                                Eo  +  u1€1  +  eke  +  vsé3  >  a  (Ef  +  5  +  63)?                (2.1)


              should  be  satisfied.
                 More  precisely,  one  states  that  ({160])  if  the  solution  U  of  the  Euler
              system  exists  in  the  class  C!  (Q)  and  this  solution  satisfies  the  condition
              (2.1),  while  inf,,,  p°(r)  >  0,  then  for  any  other  solution  U‘  €  C1  (Q)  of
              the  Euler  system,  one  could  find  a  constant  kg  >  0  such  that  6U  =  U'—U
              fulfils  ||}6U;  ||  <  ko  ]}6U;t  =  Ol|*  for  t  >  0.  Consequently  if  the  equality
              U'  =  U  holds  on  wo  (that  means  in  the  hyperplane  t  =  0),  then  it  will  be
              satisfied  at  any  point-moment  (r,t)  €  Q  (wo).  Obviously  2  (wo),  called

              the  determination  domain  for  the  solution  of  the  Cauchy  problem  with
              the  initial  data  on  wo,  is  the  union  of  all  the  domains  which  back  on  wo
              and  on  whose  boundary  the  inequality  (2.1)  is  satisfied.
                 It  has  been  also  proved  that  if  [  (wg)  is  a  smooth  boundary  (of  C?
              class)  of  the  determination  domain  2Q  (wo),  then  this  hypersurface  will

              be  a  characteristic  surface  of  the  Euler  system,  the  inequality  sign  of
              (2.1)  being  replaced  by  that  of  equality.
                 We  now  remark  that  in  the  conditions  of  an  Euler  system  in  adiabatic
              evolution  with  a  state  equation  p  =  p(p,  s)  of  C?  class,  assuming  that  the
              domain  D(é)  of  the  fluid  flow  has  the  boundary  &  (t),  which  is  composed
              of  both  rigid  and  “‘free”  parts,  and  vy  is  the  propagation  velocity  of  the
              surface  %  [33]  then,  if
                 (i)  v(r,  t),  p(r,  t),  (r,t)  are  functions  of  class  C!  on  [0,  7]  x  D,

                 (ii)  the  initial  conditions  v(r,0),  p(r,0),  s(r,0)  are  given  together  with
                 (iii)  the  boundary  conditions  v,-n  =  0  on  [0,7]  x  ©  and,  similarly,
              Vv,  p,s  in  the  regions  where  v,  <  0,
              then  the  Euler  system  (even  with  f  #  Q),  in  adiabatic  evolution,  with
              the  state  equation  p  =  p(p,s),  has  a  unique  solution’.
                 The  uniqueness  is  still  kept  even  in  the  case  when  there  are  not  bound-

              ary  conditions  at  the  points  of  &:  where  vy  >  c,  ¢  being  the  speed  of
              sound.


              ‘For  the  definition  of  the  norm  we  deal  with,  we  should  first  consider  all  the  cuts  w(t)  of  Q
              by  the  hyperplane  t  =  constant  >  0.  Then  by  introducing  the  vectorial  function  v  =  {v;}
              on  &,  its  norm  corresponding  to  the  cut  w(t)  will  be  defined  by  |[v;¢{|  =  fff  (95  v2)  dw.
                                                                                        w(t)
              ‘J.Serrin  [135].
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77