Page 78 - Basics of Fluid Mechanics and Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
P. 78

Dynamics  of Inviscid  Fluids                                                               63


             the  initial  and  the  final  value  is  again  m(['+iD).  Consequently  the

             function  f(z)  — rip  log(z  —  a)  is  uniform,  that  is  holomorphic  in  (D).
                 We  conclude  that  afunction  f(z),  in  the  case  of  a  doubly  connected
             domain,  could  be  considered  a  complex  potential  if  it  admits  the  repre-
              sentation  TP  log(z  —  a)  plus  a  holomorphic  function  of  z.
                 More  generally,  the  following  result  holds:
                 Let  (A;),  (Ae),  ...,(A,)  be  the  connected  components  of  the  com-
             plement  of  a  bounded  domain  (DP),  and  let  A,(a,)  be  a  set  of  internal

             points  of  (Aq),  respectively  (q  =  1,p).  An  analytic  function  f(z)  can  be
             considered  a  complex  potential  of  a  fluid  flow  in  (DP),  if  and  only  if  there
             are  a  set  of  real  numbers  Ty  and  D,  (q  =  1,p)  such  that

                                                   p          .
                                                       Tg  +iD
                                        fa-> <a                    log(z  —  aq)
                                                  q=1

              is  a  holomorphic  function  in  (D).

                 Case  of steady  flows.  Ifthe  flow  is  steady  u  and  v  will  be  free  of  ¢  (they
              do  not  depend  explicitly  on  time)  and  consequently  we  may  suppose  that
              ®  ,  w  and  f(z)  have  the  same  property.
                 Concerning  the  effective  determination  of  the  complex  potential  for  a
             certain  plane  flow,  it  could  be  done  taking  into  account  the  boundary

             conditions.  In  the  particular  case  when  the  fluid  past  a  fixed  wall,  this
             wall,  due  to  the  slip  condition  v  -n  =  0  =  dy,  is  a  streamline  of  our  flow
              and  consequently,  along  this  curve,  y  =  Im  f(z)  is  constant.  Conversely,
              if  a  plane  fluid  flow  is  known  (given),  we  could  always  suppose  that  a
              streamline  is  a  “solid  wall’,  because  the  slip  condition  is  automatically

             fulfilled  (¢  =  a  =  0);  shortly,  we  could  say  that  it  is  possible  to  so-
              lidify  (materialize)      the  streamlines  of  a  given  flow  (under  the  above

              assumption).
                 Finally,  supposing  that  f(z)  and  implicitly  the  velocity  field  are  deter-
             mined,  it  will  always  be  possible  to  calculate  the  pressure  at  any  point
             of  the  fluid  flow  by  using  the  second  Bernoulli  theorem  which  can  be
                 ,                  2                                             ;              Le
             written  as  K  =  £  +8  —U  =  constant.  To  assess  this  constant  it  is  suf-

             ficient  to  have  both  the  magnitude  of  the  velocity  q;  and  the  pressure  p;
             at  a  point  M;  belonging  to  the  flow  domain.  Additionally,  if  f  =  0,  we
              also  have  Te  =1-  Bry  Each  of  the  two  sides  of  the  previous  equality
                           ZFS              1
              is  non-dimensional.  The  first  one,  denoted  by  C5,  is  called  the  pressure
              coefficient.
                 Starting  from  some  analytical  functions  f(z)  satisfying  the  unifor-
             mity  properties  stated  above,  it  could  always  build  up  corresponding
             fluid  flows.  For  instance  a  linear  function  f  (z)  =  az  +  b,  a  and  6b  being
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83