Page 130 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 130

Cultural Imper al sm and Hybr d ty  |  10


              how to read donald ducK
              How To Read Donald Duck: Imperialist Ideology in the Disney Comic was a seminal study
              by Latin American author Ariel Dorfman and European scholar Armand Mattelart. First pub-
              lished in Chile in 1971, the book was an analysis of popular U.S. comic books that were sold
              in Spanish translation in Latin America. These comics contained stories set in imaginary third-
              world countries such as “Aztecland,” and depicted the natives of these lands as backward
              savages. In one comic book Donald Duck goes to Africa, where the inhabitants are happy to
              trade their valuables for trinkets because they are in awe of the trappings of “civilization.”
              Reading between the lines, Dorfman and Mattelart found messages of corporate capitalist
              ideology and native inferiority that they argued would influence Latin American readers of
              these comics to discard their own values and identities and accept U.S dominance.


              armed  force  and  occupation  to  achieve  their  political  and  economic  goals.
              In this view, cultural products can smooth the way for domination by expos-
              ing people to products they may desire, the values that are seen to accompany
              those products, and ultimately even new sources of allegiance. In short, the cul-
              tural imperialism argument is that if people in other countries consume a lot of
              U.S. television shows, films, and other media products, they are likely to forget
              or reject their own cultural roots and instead try to emulate the characters and
              practices they are exposed to through imported media.
                In Mass Communication and American Empire, well-known media scholar
              Herbert Schiller argued that the United States was extending its already size-
              able power through economic dominance of other countries’ communications
              systems and through the cultural influence carried by exported media. With
              this book Schiller set forth a fundamental claim that cultural imperialism con-
              stituted a threat to traditional cultures. Schiller went on to argue that the mass
              media were the principal vehicles for promoting Western values, and that the
              U.S. government and business sectors were deliberately attempting to mold
              developing countries’ values and institutions to benefit U.S. objectives.
                The term cultural imperialism carries with it certain assumptions about the
              relationship between the developed and developing worlds. It follows Immanuel
              Wallerstein’s world systems model that places the developed countries in the
              center, dominating the peripheral nonindustrialized countries in ways that do
              not allow those countries to develop independently. Cultural imperialism also
              draws from dependency theory, which states that underdevelopment has not
              been simply a matter of some countries progressing more slowly than others, as
              some have suggested, but rather that the developed countries derive economic
              benefits from this unbalanced relationship.

                onE-way FLows

                Analysis  of  the  global  trade  in  entertainment  products  confirms  that  the
              United States has been the world’s principal exporter of films and television
              programs, while importing very little. The recognition of this “one-way flow” of
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135