Page 386 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 386

Pol t cal Enterta nment: From The West Wing to South Park  | 


              PolitiCal MusiC
              A great deal of popular music can be fairly trivial, calling for nothing more than one’s “baby”
              to love one “till the end of time.” In contrast, however, music has also long served as a
              mouthpiece of rebellion and politics. Cheaper to produce and more decentralized than film
              or television, music has been open to more people from more walks of life. Thus, entire gen-
              res are known for their countercultural or subcultural ethos, attitude, and lyrics, from grunge
              to rap, punk to rave, and often many country, blues, and/or folk songs. Moreover, music’s
              more memorable tunes and words have frequently become rallying points for countercul-
              tural or subcultural movements, as was the case most famously with the hippie and peace
              movement of the 1960s and early 1970s. In such moments, the music can go far beyond
              being a media text, actually working as part of an active culture or subculture.



                Of particular concern is entertainment media’s capacity for politics. In crude
              terms, we could ask exactly how much politics entertainment can hold. How can
              a four-minute song or a half-hour sitcom treat any topic with due complexity?
              As we have discussed, many citizens are weary of overt politics in entertain-
              ment; consequently, producers of political entertainment all too often err on the
              side of cautiousness, adding only a light political streak. Many of the sketches
              on Saturday Night Live are illustrative here: often, they will depict political fig-
              ures, and they will reference contemporary political events, but ultimately little
              of depth is said. For instance, a sketch lampooning President Bush will play with
              his malapropisms and style of speech, and will offer quick commentary on a
              recent presidential policy or program, but the sketch will end there. For political
              decisions to be meaningful, surely we as a society must make them with as much
              information available as possible, but sketches of the Saturday Night Live variety
              offer little if any room for background information, potentially bastardizing the
              issues in question as a result.


                ThE PoLiTiCaL PowErs oF EnTErTainmEnT

                Nevertheless, critics of political entertainment as “politics lite” run the risk
              of holding out for the perfect political vessel. In truth, the often abstract and
              highly complex world of politics is usually simplified in the telling, regardless
              of the setting. Ideally, each of us could and would reserve significant time to
              learn about, discuss, and debate key political issues. But few of us do. Thus,
              a  pragmatic  approach  to  political  entertainment  might  accept  that  it  is  an
              imperfect vessel, even one that will at times cause more problems and mis-
              understandings than it will resolve, but also that in offering any politics it is
              performing a potentially vital service to a fragmented, sometimes uninformed
              society.
                Moreover, political entertainment can trump its more serious counterparts
              by  making  us  care.  The  news  in  particular  often  suffers  from  telling  us  that
              everything  is  worth  caring  about,  and  that  everything  is  an  important  story.
   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391