Page 566 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 566

V deo News Releases: A H dden Ep dem c of Fake TV News  | 

              the TV station provide clear disclosure of the source of the VNR footage to news
              viewers.
                Peter  Simmons,  an  Australian  academic  with  Charles  Sturt  University’s
              School of Communications, has written that “individual journalists and pub-
              lic relations practitioners perceive their work to be enhanced when news re-
              lease material is used without disclosure.” Another finding of the Center for
              Media  and  Democracy’s  study  supports  his  assertion.  When  one  PR  firm
              started mentioning the sponsors at the end of its prepackaged VNRs, using
              on-screen labels and verbal statements, TV stations removed these notifica-
              tions and still failed to provide disclosure to viewers in 12 out of the 15 in-
              stances documented.




              Case study: “oil loBByist’s ‘news’ denies
              inConVenient truths”
              In June 2006, the broadcast PR firm Medialink Worldwide put out a VNR titled, “Global
              Warming and Hurricanes: All Hot Air?” The firm identified “TCS Daily Science Roundtable”
              as the client behind the segment. But Medialink didn’t disclose that TCS Daily is a Web site
              published by Tech Central Station and was, at the time, a project of the Republican lobbying
              and PR firm DCI Group. Or that DCI Group counts among its clients ExxonMobil. Or that
              ExxonMobil gave the Tech Central Science Foundation $95,000 in 2003, for “climate change
              support.”
                The VNR features Dr. William Gray and Dr. James J. O’Brien, who are identified as “two
              of the nation’s top weather and ocean scientists.” Gray denies that there’s any link between
              global  warming  and  the  severity  of  recent  hurricane  seasons.  “We  don’t  think  that’s  the
              case,” he says. “This is the way nature sometimes works.”
                In reality, the link between climate change and hurricane severity has not been disproved.
              Peer-reviewed scientific studies on the issue have reached conflicting conclusions, though
              an in-depth analysis reported in September 2006 found “a large human influence” on rising
              sea-surface temperatures, which lead to stronger hurricanes. The same month, Nature mag-
              azine reported on a position paper from federal scientists that linked intensified hurricanes
              to global warming; the document was reportedly quashed by the Bush administration.
                Drs.  Gray  and  O’Brien  are  meteorologists  with  extensive  experience  predicting  hur-
              ricanes. However, neither of them are impartial. In June 2006, Gray told the Denver Post
              that global warming is a “hoax,” something that “they’ve been brainwashing us [with] for
              20 years.” O’Brien is associated with corporate-funded organizations that question climate
              change, as a member of Tech Central Station’s “Science Roundtable” and as an expert at
              the George C. Marshall Institute.
                Sadly,  none  of  these  affiliations,  caveats,  or  complexities  were  communicated  when
              WTOK-11 (Meridian, Mississippi) aired as “news” an edited and revoiced version of the TCS
              Daily VNR on May 31, 2006. Viewers were also not told that the segment was paid for and
              scripted by oil company lobbyists.
   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571