Page 347 - Becoming Metric Wise

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aad, G., et al. (ATLAS Collaboration, CMS Collaboration). (2015). Combined measure-
p
ment of the Higgs boson mass in pp collisions at ffiffi s 5 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS
and CMS experiments. Physical Review Letters, 114(19), 191803.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Rosati, F. (2014). Relatives in the same university fac-
ulty: Nepotism or merit? Scientometrics, 101(1), 737 749.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’
research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research.
Scientometrics, 86(3), 629 643.
Adamic, L. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2001). The Web’s hidden order. Communications of
the ACM, 44(9), 55 60.
Adamic, L. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2002). Zipf’s law and the internet. Glottometrics, 3(1),
143 150.
Adams, J., & Testa, J. (2011). Thomson reuters book citation index. In E. Noyons,
P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of the ISSI 2011 conference (pp. 13 18).
Durban: ISSI, Leiden University & University of Zululand.
Aguillo, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010). Comparing university rank-
ings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243 256.
Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similar-
ity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science & Technology, 54(6), 550 560.
Ahlgren, P., Yue, T., Rousseau, R., & Yang, LY. (2017). The role of the Chinese Key
Labs in the international and national scientific arena revisited. Research Evaluation, 26
(2), 132 143.
Ajiferuke, I., Burrell, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure
of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14(5 6), 421 433.
Alberts, B. (2013). Impact factor distortions. Science, 340(6134), 787 787.
Allen, L., Brand, A., Scott, J., Altman, M., & Hlava, M. (2014). Credit where credit is
due. Nature, 508(7496), 312 313.
Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the world wide web:
Methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of Documentation, 53(4),
404 426.
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). H-index: A review
focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields.
Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273 289.
Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2012). Counting citations in the field of business and manage-
ment: Why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science. Scientometrics, 93(3),
553 581.
Amos, K. A. (2014). The ethics of scholarly publishing: Exploring differences in plagia-
rism and duplicate publication across nations. Journal of the Medical Library Association,
102(2), 87 91.
Anonymous. (2016). On impact. Nature, 535(7613), 466 466.
Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College &
Research Libraries, 65(5), 372 382.
Anthonisse, J. M. (1971). The rush in a graph. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
Anuradha, K., & Urs, S. (2007). Bibliometric indicators of Indian research collaboration
patterns. A correspondence analysis. Scientometrics, 71(2), 179 189.

341