Page 362 - Becoming Metric Wise
P. 362
356 Bibliography
Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleep-
ing beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
of America, 112(24), 7426 7431.
Kessler, M. M. (1962). An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers.
M.I.T., Lincoln Laboratory.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American
Documentation, 14(1), 10 25.
Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. Journal of
Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246 254.
Kim, M. T. (1991). Ranking of journals in library and information science: A comparison
of perceptual and citation-based measures. College & Research Libraries, 52(1), 24 37.
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455 476.
Kochen, M. (1974). Principles of information retrieval. Los Angeles: Melville.
Kochen, M. (Ed.). (1989). The small world. Norwood (NJ): Ablex.
Korn, A., Schubert, A., & Telcs, A. (2009). Lobby index in networks. Physica A-Statistical
Mechanics and Its Applications, 388(11), 2221 2226.
Koshland, D. E., Jr. (2007). The cha-cha-cha theory of scientific discovery. Science, 317
(5839), 761 762.
Kosmulski, M. (2006). A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the
original index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(3), 4 6.
Kosmulski, M. (2011). Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output.
Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 481 485.
Kosmulski, M. (2012). Modesty-index. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 368 369.
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL cita-
tions: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 1055 1065.
Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., & Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of books:
The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the American Society
for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2147 2164.
Krauze, T. K., & McGinnis, R. (1979). A matrix analysis of scientific specialties and
careers in science. Scientometrics, 1(5 6), 419 444.
Krell, F-T. (2010). Should editors influence journal impact factors? Learned Publishing, 23
(1), 59 62.
Kretschmer, H. (2002). Similarities and dissimilarities in coauthorship networks: Gestalt
theory as explanation for well-ordered collaboration structures and production of sci-
entific literature. Library Trends, 50(3), 474 497.
Kretschmer, H., Pudovkin, A., & Stegmann, J. S. (2012). Research evaluation. Part II:
Gender effects of evaluation: Are men more productive and more cited than women?
Scientometrics, 93(1), 17 30.
Kretschmer, H., & Rousseau, R. (2001). Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka’s
law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(8),
610 614.
Krumov, L., Fretter, C., Mu ¨ller-Hannemann, M., Weihe, K., & Hu ¨tt, M. T. (2011).
Motifs in co-authorship networks and their relation to the impact of scientific publi-
cations. The European Physical Journal B, 84(4), 535 540.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., &
Murray, S. S. (2005a). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing
and Management, 41(6), 1395 1402.