Page 358 - Becoming Metric Wise

352 Bibliography

Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113 122.
Gime ´nez-Toledo, E., Man ˜ana-Rodrı ´guez, J., Engels, T. C. E., Ingwersen, P., Po ¨lo ¨nen, J.,
Sivertsen, G., Verleysen, F. T., & Zuccala, A. A. (2016). Taking scholarly books into
account: Current developments in five European countries. Scientometrics, 107(2),
685 699.
Gini, C. (1909). Il diverso accrescimento delle classi sociali e la concentrazione della
richezza. Giornale degli Economisti, 38,69 83.
GL’99 Conference Program. (1999). Fourth International Conference on Grey Literature:
New Frontiers in Grey Literature. GreyNet, Grey Literature Network Service.
Washington D.C. USA: 4 5 October 1999.
Gla ¨nzel, W. (1996). The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology.
Scientometrics, 35(2), 167 176.
Gla ¨nzel, W. (2006). On the opportunities and limitations of the H-index. Science Focus,
1(1), 10 11. [In Chinese]. An English translation can be found at E-LIS: http://hdl.
handle.net/10760/9378.
Gla ¨nzel, W. (2009). The multi-dimensionality of journal impact. Scientometrics, 78(2),
355 374.
Gla ¨nzel, W. (2010). What is the impact of fraudulent literature? ISSI Newsletter, 6(2),
44 47.
Gla ¨nzel, W., & Gorraiz, J. (2015). Usage metrics versus altmetrics: Confusing terminol-
ogy? Scientometrics, 102(3), 2161 2164.
Gla ¨nzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research.
Scientometrics, 53(2), 171 193.
Gla ¨nzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2013). Opinion paper: Thoughts and facts on bibliometric
indicators. Scientometrics, 96(1), 381 394.
Gla ¨nzel, W., & Rousseau, R. (2005). Erd˝ os distance and general collaboration distance.
ISSI Newsletter, 1(2), 4 5.
Gla ¨nzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988). Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation
impact. Journal of Information Science, 14(2), 123 127.
Gla ¨nzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and sub-
fields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357 367.
Gla ¨nzel, W., Thijs, B., & Schlemmer, B. (2004). A bibliometric approach to the role of
author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics, 59(1), 63 77.
Gla ¨ser, J., & Laudel, G. (2007). The social construction of bibliometric evaluations. In
R. Whitley, & J. Gla ¨ser (Eds.), The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of
research evaluation systems, sociology of sciences yearbook 26 (pp. 101 123). Dordrecht:
Springer.
Goffman, W., & Newill, V. A. (1964). Generalization of epidemic theory: An application
to the transmission of ideas. Nature, 204(4955), 225 228.
Gonza ´lez-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anego ´n, F. (2010). A new approach
to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics,
4(3), 379 391.
Goodhart, C. A. E. (1975). Problems of monetary management: The U.K. Experience.
Papers in Monetary Economics (Vol. I). Sydney: Reserve Bank of Australia.
Gordon, M. D. (1980). The role of referees in scientific communication. In J. Hartley
(Ed.), The psychology of written communication (pp. 263 275). London: Kogan Page.
Gorkova, V. I. (1988). Informetria. Reviews in Science and Technology. Moscow: VINITI.
Grayson, M. (2015). Raising standards. Nature, 520(7549), S10 S12.
Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science,
66(1713), 385 389.
Guan, JC., & Gua, X. (2009). Exploring the h-index at patent level. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 35 40.