Page 353 - Becoming Metric Wise

347
Bibliography

Cronin, B. (2012). The resilience of rejected manuscripts. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1903 1904.
Cronin, B. (2013). Self-plagiarism: An odious oxymoron. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 873 873.
Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2015). Scholarly metrics under the microscope. Medford (NJ):
Information Today.
Csiszar, A. (2016). Troubled from the start. Nature, 532(7599), 306 309.
Cummings, L. J., & Fox, D. A. (1973). Some mathematical properties of cycling strategies
using citation indexes. Information Storage and Retrieval, 9(12), 713 719.
Cyranoski, D. (2014). Cell-induced stress. Nature, 511(7508), 140 143.
Dalton, H. (1920). The measurement of the inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal,
30(119), 348 361.
Danell, R. (2014). The contribution of authors: A study of the relationship between the
size and composition of author teams. In E. Noyons (Ed.), Proceedings of the STI
Conference 2014 Leiden: “Context counts: Pathways to master Big and Little Data”
(pp. 123 131). Leiden: Universiteit Leiden, CWTS.
Davenport, E., & Cronin, B. (2001). Who dunnit it? Metatags and hyperauthorship.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(9), 770 773.
Davis, P. M. (2009). Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a cita-
tion. Learned Publishing, 22(1), 5 11.
Davis, P. M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: A randomized controlled trial of
scientific journal publishing. The FASEB Journal, 25(7), 2129 2134.
Davis, P.M. (2012). The emergence of a citation cartel. Scholarly Kitchen. ,http://scholarly
kitchen.sspnet.org/2012/04/10/emergence-of-a-citation-cartel/..
Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008).
Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial.
BMJ, 337(7665), 343 345.
Davis, P. M., & Price, J. S. (2006). eJournal interface can influence usage statistics:
Implications for libraries, publishers and Project COUNTER. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1243 1248.
De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis. From the science citation index to cyber-
metrics. Lanham (MD): Scarecrow Press.
de Bruin, R., Kint, A, Luwel, M., & Moed, H. F. (1993). A study of research evaluation
and planning: The University of Ghent. Research Evaluation, 3(1), 25 41.
De George, R. T., & Woodward, F. (1994). Ethics and manuscript reviewing. Journal of
Scholarly Publishing, 25(3), 133 145.
de Meis, L., do Carmo, M. S., & de Meis, C. (2003). Impact factors: Just part of a
research treadmill. Nature, 424(6950), 723 723.
de Mesnard, L. (2010). On Hochberg et al.’s “Tragedy of the reviewer commons”.
Scientometrics, 84(3), 903 917.
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Rijcke, S., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016).
Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use a literature review. Research
Evaluation, 25(2), 161 169.
Debackere, K., & Gla ¨nzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research
policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics, 59(2), 253 276.
Deem, R., Mok, KH, & Lucas, L. (2008). Transforming higher education in whose
image? Exploring the concept of the ‘world-class’ university in Europe and Asia.
Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 83 97.
Degraeve, Z., Lambrechts, M., & Van Puymbroeck, V. (1996). Een vergelijkende presta-
tiestudie van de departementen van de Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (A comparative