Page 378 - Becoming Metric Wise

372 Bibliography

van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in
the rankings of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133 143.
Van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and
interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40(3), 463 472.
van Rooyen, S., Black, N., & Godlee, F. (1999). Development of the review quality
instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts. Journal of Clinical
Epidemiology, 52(7), 625 629.
Vanclay, J. K. (2007). On the robustness of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1547 1550.
Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: Outdated artifact or stepping-stone to journal certifi-
cation? Scientometrics, 92(2), 211 238.
Varn, D.P. (2014). Comment posted at ASIS&T SIGMETRICS list on 22/07/2014.
Vaughan, L. (2001). Statistical methods for the information professional: A practical, painless
approach to understanding, using, and interpreting statistics. Medford, NJ: Information
Today.
Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2013). A label for peer-reviewed books. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 428 430.
Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014a). Barycenter representation of book publishing
internationalization in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1),
234 240.
Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014b). Internationalization of peer reviewed and
non-peer reviewed book publications in the Social Sciences and Humanities.
Scientometrics, 101(2), 1431 1444.
Verleysen, F. T., Ghesquie `re, P., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). The objectives, design and selec-
tion process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences
and Humanities (VABB-SHW). In W. Blockmans, et al. (Eds.), Bibliometrics: Use and
abuse in the review of research performance (pp. 115 125). London: Portland Press.
Vidgen, B., & Yasseri, T. (2016). P-values: Misunderstood and misused. Frontiers in
Physics, 4,6.
Vieira, E. S., & Gomes, J. A. N. F. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science
for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587 600.
Vinkler, P. (2010). The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators. Oxford: Chandos
Publishing.
Vitanov, N. K. (2016). Science dynamics and research production: Indicators, indexes, statistical
laws and mathematical models. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Vygotski, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Wager, E., Barbour, V., Yentis, S., & Kleinert, S. (2010). Retractions: Guidance from the
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Obesity Reviews, 11(1), 64 66.
Wagner, C. (2016). Rosalind’s ghost: Biology, collaboration, and the female. PLOS
Biology, 14(11), e2001003.
Walters, W. H. (2016). The research contribution of editorial board members in library
and information science. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 47(2), 121 146.
Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of
Informetrics, 10(2), 365 391.
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012a). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 406 415.
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012b). A new methodology for constructing a
publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378 2392.
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Visser, M. S. (2013). Some modifica-
tions to the SNIP journal impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 272 285.