Page 374 - Becoming Metric Wise

368 Bibliography

(Eds.), Proceedings of the International STI Conference (pp. 719 732). Montre ´al: Science-
Metrix.
Schneider, J. W. (2013). Caveats for using statistical significance tests in research assess-
ments. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 50 62.
Schneider, J. W. (2015). Null hypothesis significance tests. A mix-up of two different the-
ories: The basis for widespread confusion and numerous misinterpretations.
Scientometrics, 102(1), 411 432.
Schubert, A. (2002). The Web of Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 53(1), 3 20.
Schubert, A. (2009). Using the h-index for assessing single publications. Scientometrics, 78
(3), 559 565.
Schubert, A. (2012). A Hirsch-type index of co-author partnership ability. Scientometrics,
91(1), 303 308.
Schubert, A., & Gla ¨nzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for jour-
nals. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 179 184.
Schubert, A., Gla ¨nzel, W., & Braun, T. (1987). Subject field characteristic citation scores
and scales for assessing research performance. Scientometrics, 12(5 6), 267 291.
Schubert, A., Korn, A., & Telcs, A. (2009). Hirsch-type indices for characterizing net-
works. Scientometrics, 78(2), 375 382.
Schubert, A., & Soos, S. (2010). Mapping of science journals based on h-similarity.
Scientometrics, 83(2), 589 600.
Schultz, D. M. (2010). Are three heads better than two? How the number of reviewers
and editor behavior affect the rejection rate. Scientometrics, 84(2), 277 292.
Science. Wikipedia. ,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science..
SCImago. (2007). SJR — SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved January 6,
2017, from ,http://www.scimagojr.com..
Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.
Seglen, P. O. (1989). From bad to worse: Evaluation by Journal Impact. Trends in
Biochemical Sciences, 14(8), 326 327.
Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science, 43(9), 628 638.
Seglen, P. O. (1994). Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 1 11.
Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating
research. BMJ, 314(7079), 498 502.
Sen, B. K. (1997). Mega-authorship from a bibliometric point of view. Malaysian Journal
of Library and Information Science, 2(2), 9 18.
Sen, S. K., & Gan, S. K. (1983). A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic cou-
pling and its applications. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 30(2), 78 82.
Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). A citation based ranking of the business ethics scholarly
journals. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4(4), 390 399.
Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellec-
tual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2),
307 326.
Serenko, A., & Jiao, CQ. (2012). Investigating information systems research in Canada.
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue canadienne des Sciences de
l’Administration, 29(1), 3 24.
Shanahan, D. R. (2016). Auto-correlation of journal impact factor for consensus research
reporting statements: A cohort study. PeerJ, 4, e1887.
Shannon, C. E. (1948a). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical
Journal, 27(3), 379 423.
Shannon, C. E. (1948b). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical
Journal, 27(4), 623 656.