Page 370 - Becoming Metric Wise
P. 370

364   Bibliography


          Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types
                                   ˚
             of bibliometric analysis. In F. Astro ¨m, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. W. Schneider (Eds.),
             Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies. A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th
             Birthday (pp. 9 24). Leuven: ISSI.
          Perutz, M. (2002). I wish I’d made you angry earlier. Essays on science, scientists and humanity.
             Oxford: Oxford University Press.
          Phelan, T. J. (1999). A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics, 45(1),
             117 136.
          Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publi-
             cations: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and
             Management, 12(5), 297 312.
          Piternick, A. B. (1992). Name of an author. The Indexer, 18(2), 95 100.
          Piwowar, H. (2013). Value all research products. Nature, 493(7431), 159 159.
          Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
          Poole, H. L. (1985). Theories of the middle range. Norwood (NJ): Ablex.
          Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson & Co.
          Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
          Porter, A. L. (1977). Citation analysis: Queries and caveats. Social Studies of Science, 7(2),
             257 267.
          Powell, K. (2016). The waiting game. Nature, 530(7589), 148 151.
          Poynder, R. (2009). Open access: Whom would you back? See ,http://poynder.blogspot.
             be/2009/03/open-access-who-would-you-back.html..
          Prathap, G. (2011a). A thermodynamic explanation for the Gla ¨nzel-Schubert model for
             the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5),
             992 994.
          Prathap, G. (2011b). The energy-exergy-entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric
             assessment. Scientometrics, 87(3), 515 524.
          Prathap, G. (2014). Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators. Journal of
             the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 214 214.
          Price de Solla, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
          Price de Solla, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510 515.
          Price de Solla, D. J. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology,
             and nonscience. In C. E. Nelson, & D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scien-
             tists and engineers (pp. 3 22). Lexington (MA): Heath.
          Price de Solla, D. J. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advan-
             tage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292 306.
          Price de Solla, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science, .. . and beyond. New York: Columbia
             University Press.
          Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., Neylon, C. (2010). Alt-metrics: A manifesto.
             Available from ,http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/..
          Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25
             (4), 348 349.
          Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdis-
             ciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263 287.
          Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for
             research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information
             Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871 1887.
          Raisig, L. M. (1960). Mathematical evaluation of the scientific serial. Science, 131(3411),
             1417 1419.
          Ramanana-Rahary, S., Zitt, M., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Aggregation properties of
             relative impact and other classical indicators: Convexity issues and the Yule-Simpson
             paradox. Scientometrics, 79(2), 311 327.
   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375