Page 369 - Becoming Metric Wise

363
Bibliography

Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation
analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115 131.
Ohba, N., & Nakao, K. (2012). Sleeping beauties in ophthalmology. Scientometrics, 93(2),
253 264.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological
science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716.
Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks:
Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245 251.
Opthof, T., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in
the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance. Journal of Informetrics, 4
(3), 423 430.
Oromaner, M. (1975). Collaboration and impact: The career of multi-authored publica-
tions. Social Science Information/Information sur les Sciences Sociales, 14(1), 147 155.
Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2009). Mapping world-class universities on the web.
Information Processing and Management, 45(2), 272 279.
Ossenblok, T. L. B. (2016). Scientific communication in the social sciences and humanities: Analysis
of publication and collaboration patterns in flanders. Doctoral thesis University of Antwerp.
Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Engels, T. C. E. (2015). Edited books in the social sciences and
humanities: Characteristics and collaboration analysis. Scientometrics, 104(1), 219 237.
Ossenblok, T. L. B., Engels, T. C. E., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the
social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science. A comparison of publication
patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-2009). Research
Evaluation, 21(4), 280 290.
Ossenblok, T. L. B., Guns, R., & Thelwall, M. (2015). Book editors in the social sciences
and humanities: An analysis of publication and collaboration patterns of established
researchers in Flanders. Learned Publishing, 28(4), 261 273.
Ossenblok, T. L. B., Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). Co-authorship of journal
articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000 2010). Journal
of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 882 897.
Otlet, P. (1934). Traite ´ de Documentation, le Livre sur le Livre. Brussels: D. Van Keerberghen &
Sons.
Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for
the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441 453.
Overbaugh, J. (2011). A healthy work life balance can enhance research. Nature, 477
(7362), 27 28.
Palacios-Huerta, I., & Volij, O. (2004). The measurement of intellectual influence.
Econometrica, 72(3), 963 977.
Pan, R. K., & Fortunato, S. (2014). Author impact factor: Tracking the dynamics of indi-
vidual scientific impact. Scientific Reports, 4, 4880.
Pao, M. L. (1985). Lotka’s law: A testing procedure. Information Processing and Management,
21(4), 305 320.
Paradigm. Wikipedia. ,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradigm..
Pareto, V. (1895). La legge della domanda. Giornale degli Economisti (2nd series), 10,59 68.
Pautasso, M. (2014). The jump in network ecology research between 1990 and 1991 is a
Web of Science artefact. Ecological Modelling, 286,11 12.
Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2012). Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters
journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 92(2), 395 401.
Perakakis, P., Taylor, M., Mazza, M., & Trachana, V. (2010). Natural selection of aca-
demic papers. Scientometrics, 85(2), 553 559.
Perneger, T. V. (2010). Citation analysis of identical consensus statements revealed
journal-related bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(6), 660 664.