Page 368 - Becoming Metric Wise

362 Bibliography

Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of
citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86 92.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative
typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237 1249.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J.
(2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474 16479.
Motylev, V. M. (1994). Study into the stochastic process of change in the literature cita-
tion pattern and possible approaches to literature obsolescence estimation. International
Forum on Information and Documentation, 6(2), 3 12.
Muirhead, R. F. (1903). Some methods applicable to identities and inequalities of sym-
metric algebraic functions of n letters. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society,
21(February), 144 157.
Mullard, A. (2011). Reliability of ‘new drug target’ claims called into question. Nature
Reviews Drug Discovery, 10(9), 643 644.
Mulligan, A., Hall, L., & Raphael, E. (2013). Peer review in a changing world: An inter-
national study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 132 161.
Nacke, O. (1979). Informetrie. Ein neuer Name fu ¨r eine neue Disziplin. Nachrichten fu ¨r
Dokumentation, 30(6), 219 226.
Nalimov, V. V., & Mul’chenko, Z. M. (1969). Наукометрия, Изучение развития
Hауки как информационного процесса [Naukometriya, the Study of the Development
of Science as an Information Process] (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.
Naranan, S. (1970). Bradford’s law of bibliography of science: An interpretation. Nature,
227(5258), 631 632.
Neale, A. V., Dailey, R. K., & Abrams, J. (2010). Analysis of citations to biomedical arti-
cles affected by scientific misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(2), 251 261.
Nederhof, A. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Clancy, P. (2012). Calibration of bibliometric
indicators in space exploration research: A comparison of citation impact measure-
ment of the space and ground-based life and physical sciences. Research Evaluation, 21
(1), 79 85.
Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM
Review, 45(2), 167 256.
Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(23), 8577 8582.
Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newman, M. E. J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in
networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113.
Newman, M. E. J., & Watts, D. J. (1999). Scaling and percolation in the small-world net-
work model. Physical Review E, 60(6), 7332 7342.
Ngok, KL., & Guo, WQ. (2008). The quest for world class universities in China: Critical
reflections. Policy Futures in Education, 6(5), 545 557.
Nicholls, P. T. (1987). Estimation of Zipf parameters. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 38(6), 443 445. Erratum: Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 39(4), 287 (1988).
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises.
Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175 220.
Nicolaisen, J. (2008). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology,
41, 609 641.
Nijssen, D., Rousseau, R., & Van Hecke, P. (1998). The Lorenz curve: A graphical repre-
sentation of evenness. Coenoses, 13(1), 33 38.