Page 245 - Berkshire Encyclopedia Of World History Vol Two
P. 245

594 berkshire encyclopedia of world history












            economies. A functionalist understanding of modernity,  from the Portuguese capture of Ceuta, a port on the
            of the sort theorized by the German sociologist Max  Moroccan side of the Strait of Gibraltar (1415), until the
            Weber, the U.S. sociologist Talcott Parsons, or the French  development of quinine and steamships in the nine-
            sociologist Emile Durkheim, explains social phenomena  teenth century. The first Niger steamship expedition re-
            in terms of their ability to fulfill social needs and broad-  turned without casualties in 1854. An early modern
            ens this base beyond the mode of production. Here the  America might stretch from the encounters of 1492 until
            critical shifts would be from belief in miracles to belief in  the period of independence movements, from 1776 to
            science, from household-based craft production pow-  the independence of Brazil in 1822.
            ered by muscle, dung, water, and wood to factory-based  An early modern India might begin with the fifth-
            mass production powered by electricity and fossil fuels,  generation descendant of Timur, Zahir-ud-Din Muham-
            and from government justified by tradition to govern-  mad Babur, whose ancestry inspired him to conquer
            ment consciously invented.                          northern India.The Mughal dynasty he founded (1526)
              Even in the context of early modern Europe critics  would rule effectively for two centuries; the British would
            challenge the effectiveness of a deductive approach by  take charge of its Delhi nucleus in 1803.An early modern
            condemning its implication of an inevitable progress  Japan stretches from the unification efforts of Oda
            from premodernity to modernity. A deductive approach  Nobunaga (1534–1582) to the end of theTokugawa sho-
            takes little cognizance of the possibilities of various start-  gunate (the dictatorship of a Japanese military governor)
            ing points, different destinations, and particular paths. In  in 1867.Other regional historiographies fit less naturally.
            some twentieth-century cases the transition to modernity  Although the Ottomans’ 1453 conquest of Constantino-
            was less a progression than a violently dramatic change.  ple (modern Istanbul, Turkey) was timely, the Chinese
            When expanded to a global context this approach     Ming dynasty began too early (1368) and ended incon-
            becomes not only teleological (assuming a design or pur-  veniently in the middle of our early modern period
            pose in history), but also artificially Eurocentric.  (1644).Worse,key modernizing revolutions came late rel-
                                                                ative to the western European timetable—the Chinese
            Inductive Approach                                  Revolution in 1911, the Russian Bolshevik revolution in
            Rather than specify theoretical factors to be sought in the  1917,and the Kemalist (relating to theTurkish soldier and
            time period, an inductive approach examines what hap-  statesman Kemal Ataturk) revolution inTurkey in 1923.
            pened in different places and extracts from what hap-  The actual use of the phrase early modern in the peri-
            pened a set of common features. Although such an    odization of regional histories varies. Outside of Europe,
            approach removes the theoretical obstacle of a modern-  it is most commonly used in Asia, especially in works on
            izing trajectory, the historian is left with the Herculean  China, Japan, and, to a lesser extent, India. Historians of
            task of specifying processes that united all, most, or many  China sometimes extend the period into the twentieth
            of the world’s peoples. Such an approach need not focus  century. Far fewer historians write of an “early modern
            on Europe, nor need it measure the success of various  Africa” or an “early modern Brazil.” This fact is due in part
            regions in terms of their progress along Europe’s path.  to the power of the word colonial to identify these time
              How closely do the rough chronological parameters  periods. Latin American periodization is so consistently
            suggested here match the conventional historiographies  divided into pre-Columbian, colonial, and national peri-
            (the writings of history) of the various regions outside  ods that there is no need for the phrase early modern,
            Europe? Traditional periodizations in African and Amer-  which should correspond to the middle, colonial period.
            ican history are directly linked to European expansion.  In fact, the phrase early modern Mexico sometimes refers
            Marked by a European presence that could not yet dom-  to the period immediately after independence.
            inate the continent, an early modern Africa might last  The divergence of these traditional periodizations of
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250