Page 58 - Berkshire Encyclopedia Of World History Vol Two
P. 58

comparative borders and frontiers 407



             Remains of a portion of Hadrian’s Wall and
               an entranceway in Scotland. The wall was
              meant to keep the Romans from expanding
             the boundary of their Empire further north.


            and evaluated the ways in which frontier conditions
            transformed the societies and economies created as a
            result of the migration of Europeans across oceans and
            across the Eurasian steppe (the vast, usually level and tree-
            less tracts in southeastern Europe or Asia) after 1500.The
            Great Frontier was characterized by a dichotomy between
            freedom and compulsion. In some cases the frontier pro-
            moted freedom and equality (the Cossacks, European
            colonists in North America), whereas in others the avail-  tier because of its cultural baggage, but many sophisti-
            ability of land and relative shortage of labor led to  cated studies of cross-cultural interaction, ecological trans-
            enslavement or enserfment of workers. McNeill’s work  formation, and settlement owe an intellectual debt to
            helped to frame frontiers in such a way that no single out-  Turner.
            come could be considered characteristic of frontier   Applied on a global scale, the frontier concept provides
            processes.                                          a lens for examining how the forces of environment,
              Most recently anthropologist Igor Kopytoff has ap-  cross-cultural interaction, and adaptation can create new
            plied the frontier concept to broad expanses of African  communities and societies. Furthermore, frontiers
            history. In various places and periods networks of local  demonstrate how important processes of change can
            frontiers formed a great process in African history. As a  originate at the margins of existing societies and how
            result of famines, conflicts, ecological pressures, and  peripheries can become new centers.
            entrepreneurial pursuits, individuals and groups departed
            their settlements to take up residence in “no-man’s lands”  The Question of
            beyond the jurisdiction of established communities.After  Ancient Borders
            they were successfully established, they formed a nucleus  Although people often consider borders to be character-
            of a new group, which could serve as a magnet for the  istically modern, recent research by Italian historian
            disaffected groups and individuals from neighboring  Mario Liverani has documented their existence in inter-
            societies. Given the right conditions (distance, ecological  national relations of the ancient Near East. During the
            barriers, inability of existing societies to extend control),  late Bronze Age (c. 1550–1200 BCE) interstate relations
            new polities (political organizations) emerged at the  developed between emerging states in Anatolia (in mod-
            margins of existing polities. Some of these new polities  ern Turkey), Egypt, Mesopotamia, and the lands adjacent
            eventually became powerful enough to form new polities  to or between those states. Many of the rulers of such
            and absorb their older neighbors. Kopytoff’s model effec-  ancient states claimed to be universal rulers, but they
            tively distanced frontiers from predetermined outcomes:  nonetheless delineated fixed borders of effective control.
            “The frontier is permissive rather than determinant, it  In the ideology of kingship, the ruler should continuously
            does not create a type of society, but provides an institu-  expand his territory to the ends of the known world.
            tional vacuum for the unfolding of social processes”  Because the process of expansion would never be com-
            (Kopytoff 1987, 14).Thus, each frontier provides the pos-  plete, rulers often erected commemorative monuments at
            sibility of generating multiple outcomes.           the extremities of the territories they had conquered or
              Comparative frontier studies have gradually aban-  traversed. Liverani writes: “if we view the border as an
            doned the Eurocentric models promoted by Turner and  elastic perimeter that follows the outward movements of
            his students. Historians in the United States still debate  the king, the stela [a stone slab or pillar used for com-
            Turner’s legacy, with some even rejecting the term fron-  memorative purposes], which has his name and image
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63