Page 142 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol IV
P. 142

peacemaking in the modern era 1443












            instituted led to a century of peace that lasted until  seemed to pose a real threat in 1919, and the peace-
            World War I.                                        makers had to act with speed to stabilize international
                                                                relations. But as Jack C. Roth explains,“the defeat of Ger-
            The Treaty of Versailles                            many concealed the fact that in 1919 her potential for
            The European balance of power resulting from the    European domination was possibly greater than it had
            Vienna peacemaking process didn’t survive World War I,  been in 1914. The war, in fact, ended in such a way as
            and the nature and aims of the conflict imposed a shift  to break up the very coalition needed to keep Germany
            in the peacemaking process.The waging of total war led  in check” (1968, 92).
            to a peacemaking process that basically excluded the  The peacemaking process at Versailles was inspired by
            defeated nations from the resulting balance of power to  a collective will to “legalize” international relations, and
            prevent them from seeking to redefine it anew.       the absence of any coercive mechanism meant that the
              The human cost of the war was on such a scale that  whole system rested on the goodwill of its adherents. In-
            two new elements were introduced into the peacemaking  capable of stopping Japan’s invasion of China in 1931,
            process that took place at the Palace of Versailles in  Germany’s rearmament, or Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia,
            1919: war guilt and the establishment of a collective  the League demonstrated the weakness of the collective
            forum aimed at keeping war at bay.Through its infamous  diplomacy introduced at Versailles and the difficulty of
            Article 231, the Treaty of Versailles, signed on 28 June  achieving a stable peacemaking process without the use
            1919, held Germany solely responsible for the war.  of coercion.
            Excluded from the peace negotiations, Germany was
            required to pay financial reparations, disarm, and limit  From World War II
            the size of its standing army and navy, and it was banned  to the Cold War
            from building a new air force.                      It is the alliance between Britain, the United States and
              Under the influence of U.S. President Woodrow Wil-  the Soviet Union that defeated Germany in 1945. Fol-
            son (1856–1924), the victorious powers accepted the  lowing a second German bid for power in Europe, the
            establishment of an international organization designed  victors decided to build a suitable peacemaking process
            to ensure by diplomacy and collective security the polit-  aimed at ensuring the European status quo. The end of
            ical status quo resulting from the Versailles settlement.  World War II marks a significant shift in international
            With the aim of legalizing diplomacy by replacing armed  politics. It marks the end of European domination and
            conflict with negotiation, the treaty created the League of  the emergence of an international system based on the
            Nations, an international forum and ancestor to the  existence of two superpowers: the United States and the
            United Nations. Acting as an international forum aimed  Soviet Union.
            at achieving a general disarmament process, it failed  In Yalta and Potsdam, Britain, the Soviet Union, France,
            under the pressure of the Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy,  and the United States tried to build a suitable peacemak-
            both seeking to change the balance of power resulting  ing process aimed at resolving, once and for all, the Ger-
            from the war.                                       man problem. If the United States and the Soviet Union
              Without any authority other than the moral value of  hoped in 1945 to perpetuate their wartime collabora-
            its covenant, the League epitomized the failure of the  tion, their ideological divide soon shattered any hopes of
            peacemaking process that took place in 1919. It must be  collaboration, and once more the international status
            understood that the peacemaking process was motivated  quo rested on an equilibrium between dominant powers,
            by pragmatism.The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and  namely the Soviet Union and the United States. In fact,
            the numerous revolutionary movements in Central Europe  the incompletion of the peacemaking process meant
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147