Page 191 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol IV
P. 191

1492 berkshire encyclopedia of world history












            to feed, clothe, and house increasing numbers of their  ing young children is not such a problem. Furthermore
            own species.                                        agriculture makes it possible to increase the amount of
                                                                food produced within a given area, so it is possible to
            Paleolithic Migration                               accommodate population increase even without migrat-
            and Early Agriculture                               ing to new lands. Perhaps even more important, for farm-
            Population increase is apparent even in the Paleolithic  ing households in most pre-modern agricultural commu-
            era, though in this era it mainly took the form of a slow  nities it was important to have lots of children because
            but accelerating capacity to migrate into new environ-  this increased the available labor. In a world of high
            ments. Humans probably evolved in the savanna lands  death rates (commonly in pre-modern agricultural soci-
            of southern and eastern Africa, and for all but the last ten  eties, up to 20 percent of infants died in their first year,
            thousand years, we have lived as foragers. But the variety  and another 30 percent before their fifth birthday), the
            of foraging techniques used by humans clearly increased  best way of maximizing the number of children surviving
            over time. Archaeological evidence suggests that even  to adulthood was to have as many children as possible.
            100,000 years ago, humans were exploring new environ-  Such behavior, and the increased resources available
            ments—in arid regions, for example, or near seashores  within agrarian societies, ensured that populations
            or in tropical forests (McBrearty and Brooks 2000, 493–  would grow much faster than in the Paleolithic era.
            494, 530). Then, from about 100,000 years ago,        As in the Paleolithic era, population growth led to
            humans began to migrate out of Africa.They appeared in  migrations, and as farmers migrated they helped spread
            the very different environments of Australia (from per-  agriculture around the world. But migration was not the
            haps fifty thousand years ago), ice age Siberia (perhaps  only option, for farmers, unlike foragers, could also cre-
            thirty thousand years ago), and finally the  Americas  ate larger and more densely settled communities. Even-
            (from at least thirteen thousand years ago). Though we  tually, “intensification” of this kind led to the emergence
            have no direct evidence, we can be sure that these migra-  of communities large enough and complicated enough
            tions meant an increase in the total number of humans.  to be called cities. Seeing these long-term trends was not
            This remains true even though each particular commu-  always easy at the time, because local population gains
            nity remained small, so that contemporaries could hardly  could easily be wiped out by famines or epidemics. So,
            be aware that human numbers were increasing.        to contemporaries, cycles of growth and decline were
              From about ten thousand years ago, as the last ice age  more apparent than the long-term trend toward growth.
            was ending, agricultural communities appeared in dif-  Indeed, these cycles provide the central idea of Thomas
            ferent parts of the world. Agriculture quickened popula-  Malthus (1766–1834), the founder of modern demo-
            tion growth. Current estimates suggest that there may  graphic studies: that population growth would always
            have been 5 to 10 million humans ten thousand years  end up exceeding productive capacity so that periodic
            ago; 50 million five thousand years ago; and 250 million  population crashes were inevitable.
            just one thousand years ago.Agriculture stimulated pop-
            ulation growth in many ways. Nomadic foragers have a  Industrial and Scientific
            limited ability to increase production from a given area,  Innovation
            so they have powerful reasons to limit the number of  In the last thousand years, population growth has accel-
            children too young to walk or forage on their own, and  erated once again as the global human population has
            to limit the numbers trying to feed from a given area.  risen from 250 million one thousand years ago, to 950
            Modern anthropological studies suggest that foragers  million two hundred years ago, and more than 6 billion
            have many ways of limiting population growth, includ-  today. There are many specific causes for population
            ing prolonged breast feeding and even infanticide. How-  increase in given instances, but once again, the most gen-
            ever, agriculturalists are normally sedentary, so transport-  eral explanation for this increase is that increasing rates
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196