Page 238 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol IV
P. 238

race and racism 1539



                                               One ever feels his twoness—an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts,
                                             two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideas in one dark body, whose dogged
                                      strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder. • W. E. B. Du Bois (1868–1963)



            least, settler prejudice against the Native Americans was  resulted in infertile hybrids; thereby proving they were
            predominantly based on perceived cultural rather than  separate species.
            physical differences.                                 In the last decades of the eighteenth century, a number
                                                                of prominent scientists, including two Germans, S. T.
            Scientific Verification and                         Soemmering and Christopher Meiners, conducted exten-
            Theories of Race                                    sive anatomical investigations of different human types,
            Until the last decades of the eighteenth century, racial dis-  using mainly skeletal remains for which they had only
            tinctions and the concept of race itself remained vague  limited non-European samples. The purpose of these
            and mutable. Early attempts to distinguish basic types  exercises in comparative anatomy was to provide an
            within the human species in the mid-seventeenth century  empirical grounding for determining specific bodily dif-
            were crude and impressionistic. It is believed that the first  ferences between racial groups and to establish more
            of these was by the humanist Isaac de la Peyrère who in  precise—hence ostensibly scientific—classifications of
            a 1655 treatise on the descendants of Adam and Eve,  basic racial types within the human species. Popularized,
            chose skin color as his key marker and lumped most hu-  and in many cases seriously distorted, by numerous
            man groups according to whether they were reported as  nineteenth-century racist thinkers, including physicians
            “red,” “yellow,” “black,” or “brown.” In the 1680s the inde-  who sought to refine or revise the findings of earlier inves-
            fatigable traveler François Bernier argued there were five  tigators, racial classifications proliferated steadily. In
            main types of humans, including a catch-all  “light-  some cases race studies were merged with “scientific”
            skinned” category and an equally variegated “African”  explorations of innate criminal types or utilized in tracts
            grouping, and opined that the relatively minuscule Lapp  by eugenists and other evolutionist thinkers arguing for
            herder peoples of the Scandinavian north composed a  the prohibition of race mixtures or promoting ones
            comparable category. Neither of these writers sought to  deemed advantageous for the improvement of domi-
            set forth clear criteria on which these differences between  nant, hence superior races, whether “Caucasian” or “Mon-
            human groups could be discerned and tested. A century  goloid.” By the middle decades of the nineteenth century,
            later, a number of natural philosophers, most promi-  the scientific study of race had fostered the production of
            nently the Scotsman Lord Monboddo, who had not even  a remarkable variety of instruments to measure the
            seen most of the peoples he wrote about, asserted that  anatomical features of cadavers, skeletons, and skulls of
            Africans, or Negroes, were closer (mainly on the basis of  specimens for different racial groups. Increasingly, the
            physical appearance) to apes than humans. In contrast  focus of these efforts to quantify racial distinctions came
            to Lord Monboddo and other armchair naturalists, the  to be concentrated on the comparative measurements of
            physician Edward Long had lived for decades in the  skull samples from different human groups. By the last
            midst of the large African slave population in Jamaica.  decades of the century, the “science” of phrenology was
            Large sections of Long’s History of Jamaica (first pub-  pervasive in European societies, a constant presence in
            lished in 1774) were devoted to descriptions of the  venues as disparate as the ponderous deliberations of sci-
            unflattering physical features and signs of cultural debase-  entific societies and anthropological associations, such
            ment of the slave population that set them off from the  best-selling books as the Sherlock Holmes mysteries by
            European planter class. Like Monboddo, Long went to  Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, and the seaside amusement
            great lengths to chronicle the biological differences that  stands of Great Britain, where one could have one’s head
            made the Africans more akin to “lower” animal species  measured in considerable detail for a small fee.The influ-
            than “whites.” But Long also argued at great length, and  ence of evolutionary thinking, the assertion of Christian
            with considerable pretension to scientific authority, that  doctrine, and some of the more credible scientific studies
            miscegenation between Negroes and “whites” invariably  led over the last half of the nineteenth century to the slow
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243