Page 372 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol IV
P. 372

scientific instruments 1673












            might look impressive, like the gilt brass telescopes of  out about the natural world, but this use is the underly-
            eighteenth-century European observatories, or they might  ing idea behind the other four: Instruments provide ways
            be deceptively plain, functional and compact black boxes  of looking at, understanding, and telling others about the
            packed with electronic circuitry. What links all these  natural world.
            instruments is that they were made and used to study the  Recent work in the sociology of scientific knowledge
            natural world or to tell others about the natural world:  has shown that the actual processes of (Western) scien-
            activities common to many world cultures. However, the  tific researchers and their use of instruments are less
            custodians of these collections sometimes have trouble  objective than the third-person passive-voiced articles
            defining what to include under the heading “scientific  reporting their results would have the reader believe.The
            instruments” and therefore what to collect. Deborah  role of skill and tacit knowledge looms large, and espe-
            Warner, a curator at the Smithsonian Institution in Wash-  cially so in the use of instruments. Thus, if in the much
            ington, DC, in an article entitled “What Is a Scientific  better-studied case of Western scientific investigation we
            Instrument, When Did It Become One, and Why?,”      have much to learn about the ways that people use
            explores the changing meanings of the term scientific  objects to find out about the natural world, in other
            instrument and concludes that the term is problematic.  world cultures we have even more to learn.
            She says that it should not be used as often as it is and  Helene Selin, editor of the Encyclopedia of the history
            should be replaced by terms contemporary with the   of science, technology and medicine in non-Western cul-
            instruments that are being studied.                 tures, believes that to study science in non-Western
              Albert Van Helden and Thomas L. Hankins also dis-  cultures we must accept that each culture has its own sci-
            cuss the ambiguity of the term scientific instrument in  ence that defines and predicts natural events and that
            their introduction to a collection of essays entitled Instru-  each science is valid in terms of its culture. She contends
            ments,  suggesting that the ambiguity inherent in the  that our own science also is a reflection of its culture and
            terms  science  and  instrument  might be a virtue. They  that culture is a factor in each step of doing science.
            believe that we should look at the variety and contexts of  Acknowledging the Western focus of most scholarship
            the uses of such instruments rather than make a list of  on scientific instruments,Van Helden and Hankins sug-
            which kinds of objects we are to count as scientific  gest that,“Looking at instruments in a non-Western soci-
            instruments.They list four uses to which instruments are  ety teaches us that their use and intended purpose is not
            put. First,Van Helden and Hankins point out that instru-  obvious, and warns us, by reflection, that the role of
            ments confer authority and settle disputes—instruments  instruments in Western science is sure to be even more
            are part of the attempts by practitioners to convince oth-  complex . . .” (Van Helden and Hankins 1994, 6).
            ers of the validity of their ideas. Second, and linked to the  They suggest that we look at how scientific instruments
            first use,Van Helden and Hankins point out that instru-  have worked in humanity’s consideration of the natural
            ments are created for audiences, that is, the wider com-  world—the different uses to which objects have been put.
            munity, including patrons and supporters, who is    In Selin’s terms, we must look at how instruments have
            interested in the practitioners’ activities. Third, Van  worked within the different frameworks that she calls “sci-
            Helden and Hankins suggest that one use of instru-  ence”—the ways that people consider and have consid-
            ments is to act as a bridge between natural science and  ered the natural world.
            popular culture, through the symbolic and educational  This focus on how objects are used, by whom, and for
            uses of objects. Fourth, Van Helden and Hankins note  what purposes means that we can see objects that are
            that the role of instruments changes when they are used  superficially similar in function but that relate to people
            to study living things. In none of these four uses is there  and their activities in quite different ways. For example,
            an explicit statement that people use instruments to find  navigation at sea in eighteenth-century Europe relied on
   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377