Page 382 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol IV
P. 382

secularism 1683








             although in his later years especially after the 1962
             debacle he came under the influence of at least one
             mystic. His orthodox secularism sought to alienate  the reality was that such rules were issued and interpreted
             the Indian from his hoary past.                    contemporaneously by philosophers, affirmed by politi-
               Since nearly 85 per cent of Indians are pan-Hindu  cians, and enforced by soldiers.
             in beliefs, and Hindu religion from its inception has  The routine creation and enforcement of binding laws,
             been without a ‘Church’,‘Pope’ or ‘Book’ (in contra-  although cloaked in the pursuit of justice, was largely
             distinction to Christianity or Islam), therefore neither  devoid of fearing the wrath of God. However, there was
             Martin Luther nor Marx made any sense to the Indian  no systematically written secular doctrine articulated.
             masses. Since there was little political challenge to  An alternative, secular moral paradigm to secure social
             Nehru after the untimely death of Gandhiji and Patel,  equality and moral consistency did not evolve, valiant
             the Marxian secularism concept superficially pre-   attempts by learned men such as Socrates (c. 470–399
             vailed in the Indian milieu till his demise in 1964.The  BCE), Plato (c. 428–348 or 347 BCE), and Aristotle (384–
             masses therefore had humoured Nehru out of respect  322 BCE) notwithstanding.The rise of Christianity in the
             for him without imbibing his concept of secularism.  first centuries CE and of Islam after the seventh century CE
             A conceptual void of what secularism means for     provided guidelines for such cohesion, although at the
             India, and what part of history was to be owned how-  cost of submission to the supreme authority of organized
             ever remained to be filled.                         religions that penalized and crushed most secular, inde-
             Source: Swamy, S. (2004). Redefining Secularism. The Hindu. Retrieved from http://  pendent thoughts.
             www.hindu.com/2004/03/18/stories/2004031801941000.htm
                                                                The Middle Ages
                                                                Throughout medieval times, from the decline of the
                                                                Roman Empire around 500 CE to the Renaissance in the
                                                                fifteenth century, the collaboration of insular church and
              Faith, especially one that adheres to an omnipotent  state powers secured a potent hegemony.There was little
            God, has been a customary answer to the trials and tribu-  tolerance and pluralism in what became known as Latin
            lations of mortals.Adherence to specific dogmas became  Christendom or in Muslim lands. Parochial institutions
            an organizing principle. Whether it is Judaism, Chris-  and political incumbents branded individuals and groups
            tianity, Islam, Hinduism, or Confucianism, followers of  that dissented from official dogmas as heretics and as infi-
            such traditions surrender many of their basic life deci-  dels. A public challenge to the legitimacy of holy people
            sions, and the authority over the evolution of their lives,  and sacred documents often led to a painful, premature
            to an outside entity.Those who hold religious convictions  death at the violent hands of religious authorities. Des-
            usually expect reward or punishment based on their  ignating this rigid era as a “dark age” is thus appropriate.
            commitment, conduct, prayers, performance of rituals,
            and degree of sacrifice.                             Early Modern Europe
                                                                From the fifteenth century onward, especially throughout
            Classic Times                                       western and central Europe, a fundamental change tran-
            Both the Greeks and the Romans espoused a framework  spired. Several elements interfaced.They included the pro-
            of peremptory norms that supersede and prevail over  liferation of trade-oriented city-states that carved
            humanmade, ordinary stipulations. The Romans aimed  economic prominence and political freedom while resent-
            to abide by compelling laws, jus cogens (literally, com-  ing papal supremacy; the growing independence of com-
            pelling laws); the Greeks had natural law. Ostensibly, the  peting monarchies; the teachings of Martin Luther
            authority for proclaiming these moral standards came  (1483–1546) and the subsequent Protestant Reforma-
            from mythical gods or ancient forefathers. Nevertheless,  tion; the writings of Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677); and
   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387