Page 219 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol V

1996 berkshire encyclopedia of world history

two units going to India for every one going to Pakistan. MacMunn, G.F. (1911). The armies of India. London, UK: Adam &
Partition gave Pakistan most of the cantonments and Charles Black.
Marston, D. P. (2003). Phoenix from the ashes: The Indian army in the
training facilities, but gave India the war industries. Burma campaign. London: Praeger.
Between 1947 and 1999, India and Pakistan fought four Mason, P. (1974). A matter of honour: An account of the Indian army, its
officers, and men. London: Macmillan.
wars, one of which, in 1971, led to the independence of
Menezes, S. L. (1993). Fidelity and honour:The Indian army from the sev-
East Pakistan as the nation of Bangladesh. Two of the enteenth to the twenty-first century. New Delhi, India: Viking Penguin.
wars have been stalemates and two have been Indian vic- Moreman, T. R. (1998). The army in India and the development of fron-
tier warfare, 1849–1947. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
tories.These wars have been short, reflecting the immense Nath, R. (1990). Military leadership in India: Vedic period to Indo-Pak
cost of modern warfare for developing countries. Insur- wars. New Delhi, India.
Pande, S. R. (1970). From sepoy to subedar: Being the life and adventures
gency still continues in Kashmir, which has been unoffi-
of Subedar Sita Ram, a native officer of the Bengal army, written and
cially partitioned. Though the military officers of both related by himself (J. Lunt, Ed.). London: Macmillan.
countries are still mostly drawn from the “martial races,” Peers, D. M. (1995). Between Mars and mammon: Colonial armies and the
garrison state in India, 1819–1835. London: I. B.Tauris.
their civil-military relations are radically different. Praval, K. C. (1987). Indian army after independence. New Delhi, India:
Whereas the Indian military has been effectively subor- Lancer International.
Roberts, F. S. (1898). Forty-one years in India: From subaltern to field mar-
dinated to the civilian democratic government, Pakistan
shal. London: Macmillan.
has been subjected to long periods of military rule Rosen, S. P. (1996). Societies and military power: India and its armies.
(1958–1972, 1977–1988; 1998–present). Both coun- Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Sarkar, J. N.(1984). The art of war in medieval India. New Delhi, India:
tries now have nuclear weapons but are reasonably sta- Munshiram Manoharlal.
ble states. Sen, L. P. (1969). Slender was the thread. New Delhi, India: Orient
Longman.
Chandar S. Sundaram Stanley, P. (1998). White mutiny: British military culture in India. New
York: New York University Press.
Stein, B. (1980). Peasant state and society in medieval south India. Delhi,
India: Oxford University Press.
Further Reading Sundaram, C. S. (1995).A paper tiger: The Indian National Army in bat-
tle, 1944–45. War & Society, 13(1), 35–59.
Basham, A. L. (1954). The wonder that was India:A survey of the history
and culture of the Indian sub-continent before the coming of the Mus- Sundaram, C. S. (2002). Reviving a “Dead Letter”: Military Indianization
lims. London: Collins. and the Ideology of Anglo-India, 1885-1891. In P. S. Gupta &
Cohen, S. P. (1991). The Indian army: Its contribution to the development A. Deshpande (Eds.), The British Raj and its Indian armed forces,
of a nation (2nd ed.). Delhi, India: Oxford University Press. 1857-1939. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press
Gaylor, J. (1992). Sons of John company: The Indian and Pakistani
armies, 1903–1991. Tonbridge Wells, UK: Spellmount.
Gommans, J. J. L. (2002). Mughal warfare: Indian frontiers and the high
roads to empire. London: Routledge.
Gommans, J. J. L., & Kolff, D. H. A. (Eds.). (2001). Warfare and
weaponry in South Asia, 1000–1800. Delhi, India: Oxford University Warfare—
Press.
Harfield, A. (1990). The Indian army of the empress, 1861–1903. Ton-
bridge Wells, UK: Spellmount. Southeast Asia
Heathcote,T.A. (1995). The military in British India:The development of
British land forces in South Asia, 1600–1947. Manchester, UK: Man-
chester University Press.
Kautilya. (1990). The Arthashastra (L. N. Rangarajan, Trans. & Ed.). ndigenous warfare has been an important compo-
Delhi, India: Penguin. Inent of Southeast Asian society. Not only did meth-
Kolff, D. H.A. (1990). Naukar, Rajput and Sepoy:The ethnohistory of the ods of warfare change and improve over time, but
military labour market in Hindustan, 1450–1850. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press. warfare emphasized social relationships as well. The
Kukreja, V. (1991). Civil-military relations in South Asia: Pakistan, purpose of armed conflict changed over time and was
Bangladesh and India. London: Sage.
Longer,V. (1974). Red coats to olive green:The Indian army, 1600–1974. interpreted differently from the way it was interpreted in
Bombay (Mumbai), India: Allied. the West.