Page 245 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol V
P. 245

2022 berkshire encyclopedia of world history





                 Selections from the Writings of
                 Confucianists and Neo-Confucianists on War


                 In his punitive expedition,Tang began with Ge.With  barbarians complained. They all said, ‘Why does he
                 this, he gained the trust of the Empire,...so when he  not come to us first?’”
                 marched to the south, the northern barbarians com-  When King Wu marched on Yin, he had three hun-
                 plained, “Why does he not come to us first?” The   dred war chariots and three thousand brave warriors.
                 people longed for his coming as they longed for a  He said,“Do not be afraid, I come to bring you peace,
                 rainbow in time of severe drought.Those who were  not to wage war on the people.” Then, the sound of
                 going to market did not stop; those who were plow-  people knocking their heads on the ground—to show
                 ing went on plowing. He only punished the evil    gratitude and respect—was like the collapse of a
                 rulers and brought security to the people, like the  mountain.To wage a punitive war is to rectify.There
                 fall of timely rain, and the people rejoiced greatly in  is no one who does not wish himself to be rectified.
                 his coming. (Mencius 1B.11)                       What, then, is the need for war? (Mencius 7B.4)
                   There are people who say, “I am expert at military  The humane man indeed loves others; because he
                 formations; I am expert at waging war.” This is a grave  loves others, he hates to see men bring harm to them.
                 crime. If the ruler of a state is drawn to humanity, he  The righteous man acts on his sense of appropriateness,
                 will have no match in the Empire. Thus, “When he  and so he hates to see men commit terrible wrongs.He
                 marched to the south, the northern barbarians com-  takes up arms only in order to put an end to violence
                 plained; when he marched to the east, the western  and harm, not in order to contend with others for
                                                                   spoils.Therefore,where the troops of a humane ruler are



            over resources like good land, but unlike states, most  Moats and defensive walls—powerful indicators of
            chiefdoms did not have the manpower or political struc-  warfare—have a much higher survival probability than
            ture to conquer and hold onto others’ lands. They may  painted murals, fragile scrolls, or wooden spears that may
            therefore have contented themselves with burning a rival  tell of equally significant warfare. Moreover, other fea-
            village, destroying its temple or Men’s House, killing its  tures of warfare—for instance, perishable weapons, troop
            chief, then returning home to torture or sacrifice a few  movements, battle actions, and others—are archaeolog-
            prisoners.                                          ically invisible.This survey is based on six standard indi-
              Thus, chiefly warfare among pre-state societies already  cators for detecting the emergence of warfare for a given
            contains many of the later characteristics (political  region in a given period: forensic, locational, structural,
            motives, incipient warrior classes, specialized weapons,  artifactual, iconographic, and epigraphic.
            basic military engineering) that warfare will develop and
            enhance with increased political complexity. Prior to  Forensic
            chiefly warfare, belligerents manifested only an archaic  Forensic evidence of warfare is contained in human
            form of warfare that was not distinguishable from basic  skeletal remains, including but not exclusively violent
            homicidal and hunting skills (coordinated killing of other  traumatic wounds. Embedded projectile points, parry
            humans).                                            fractures, perforated or fractured skulls, decapitated or
                                                                dismembered skeletons, and other similarly deadly
            Indicators of the                                   lesions imparted by force constitute forensic evidence that
            Earliest Warfare                                    may indicate the presence of warfare, particularly when
            Measurement of warfare origins is based on several indi-  such remains are present in large numbers in a small area
            cators or multiple lines of evidence, an indispensable  (high density of skeletal trauma) having some military sig-
            redundant strategy because unfortunately all indicators  nificance. Forensic evidence must be used with caution
            do not have the same survivability in the extant record.  because alternative explanations for its presence—for
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250